Here's a paywalled editorial recommending #OpenAccess, #OpenData, and #OpenScience. The authors/editors could easily have made it OA, but they put it behind a paywall instead.
"Open science should be a pleonasm"
https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.15962
Update. Here's another paywalled editorial on #openaccess that the authors/editors could have easily made OA.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ijd.16576
But this one is critical, not supportive. Honest Q: Is that a reason to put it behind a paywall? Wouldn't they like their objections to have more impact?
The objections restate the classic misunderstandings that all or most OA journals charge #APCs and all or most APCs are paid by authors.
Because it's an editorial, it did not have to survive peer review.
petersuber
Elio Campitelli