@kkomaitis Uhm, metaverses have existed for nearly 20 years (eg #SecondLife) - so presumably you're referring to Meta's implementation of one.
Ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaverse#Implementations
Correction: more than 20 years.
@happyborg @kkomaitis no. Before my time. But I think that’s what the snow crash metaverse was based on. Generally the main thing that ppl seem to be excited by is having a visual 3D environment shared with other people you interact with.
Without the visual element you could probably push it back to the first multi user systems. Things like ‘write’ to send messages to someone else’s terminal.
@thegrugq @kkomaitis I'd set the bar as some shared environment created in the computer in which each person experiences their own perspective of a greater whole. I don't think write makes the cut as the shared 'space' is outside.
MUD = Multi User Dungeon is the first I recall ...barely. I think Moria came soon after which I remember slightly better but I played rogue more (single user). All played using text terminals.
Much later.. Doom death match mode was 👌
@happyborg @kkomaitis that’s a reasonable definition, but I think the visual element is what gets the public excited.
I know MUDs but I was never interested. I spent my time on IRC.
There’s a paper / blog post I read.. decade or more ago, which was by a guy who ran a MUD. I think. It was about how communities grow and what people look for in games. Things like “freedom of speech” is easy as a principle when you have a small community, but when the assholes show up things have to change. And this is always gonna be one of the defining points in the community culture. Do you eject the asshole, or let them stay and lose some number of other people.
It was fascinating because it predicted basically all the stuff that happened with reddit and Facebook and I guess Elon at twitter.
I can’t find it anymore. Frustrates me.
Anyway, I’m going to say there’s a non zero chance that some weird BSD system in the 70s had some primitive type of MUD system… or some other random box at a University somewhere. But we’ll probably never know :)
@thegrugq @kkomaitis Those Egyptian tombs might be worth a look and I'll bet the Sumerians had Tetris.
PS I've no idea if I actually mean the Sumerians but 🤷♂️
Immersive (headset) VR is kind of dumb. Tech drive super-hype.
Non-immersive AR has massive potential - digital twins, AR and data come together for real-world insight.
I covered this in trend #17 of my '23 Trends for 2023' series.
https://jimcarroll.com/2023/01/23-trends-for-2023-17-non-immersive-vr-and-ar/
Part of the art of figuring out the future is knowing this – you’ll often find the real trend by looking beyond the hype to what’s actually happening! The hype? Virtual headset virtual reality, best epitomized by the bold but somewhat doomed bet by Mark Zuckerberg with his Meta initiative. The reality? The return of […]
@kkomaitis @mmasnick I think at some point telepresence conferencing, shopping and socialising will be useful, but we’re a long way from that now, and who knows what it’ll look like.
Keep pressing and the only definition is “Read Snowcrash.” But I think that’s likely to be like someone in 1970 saying read 2001 if you want to know what space travel will look like in 2001.