@Popehat “This case should never have been brought. Its inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start. No reasonable lawyer would have filed it. Intended for a political purpose, none of the counts of the amended complaint stated a cognizable legal claim.”

@avram @Popehat Someone should finish line editing the judge's poem for him. Here's a start.

* This Case Should Never Have Been Brought *
by The U.S. Southern District Court of Florida

Inadequacy made evident from the start
that these lawyers would not play it smart,

suing for political aim
when none of the counts
even amounts
to a cognizable legal claim.

Thirty-one individuals and entities—
I think you’ll recall their identities—
endured needless harm
from dishonest alarm

1/2

@avram @Popehat

all for a political narrative.

Their misuse of the courts
undermines the rule of law,
fashions judges out of straw,
and diverts a limited resource
from filers in honest need of recourse.

As for Plaintiff J. Trump and his attorney at the crux:
That’ll be one million bucks.

2/2

@dawni @Popehat
“This case is not a case of honor… no cognizable claim is enumerated here… nothing valued is here. What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us.”