Not a new comment, but the label “debt ceiling” makes it difficult for many to understand and easy to exploit.
You're right. The first person I heard vow to vote against raising the debt ceiling was Michele Bachmann, who realized that it was a thing you could campaign on that SOUNDED like it was fiscally responsible. Then the whole Republican Party caught on that this was campaign-ad gold, because nobody understood that the debt ceiling was not the debt, and now here we are.
@JacquesBouchard @rbreich OK, the why is both outsized and overestimated perceived leverage. And because this periodic quicksand has been, unwisely, built into federal law.
The propaganda—$31 thousand billion!!—can be handled in in less irresponsible ways.
Well that’s not true.
The Treasury has enough money flowing in throughout the year to cover bills it’s already taken on regardless of the debt ceiling.
Politicians (and corporate media) do try to confuse that by misleading people into thinking the bills are all taken on the moment an appropriations bill is signed, though.
That misconception needs to be corrected, as the federal government takes on bills throughout the year.
@rbreich I understood this “fundamental truth”after receiving…
My 2nd 💳…(Jacobson’s) bill…💸
History has proven over & over again…that…
Dems may like the “Layaway plan”…
Repubs have no honor…they’re the “Dine & Dash” sort.
Someone else pays for your decisions.
Seems…cowardly.