I keep seeing articles, about people trying to violently overturn election results, that use phrases like “motivated by election lies”.

They aren’t motivated by lies, they are motivated by not liking the result. Repeating the lies just makes them feel powerful because it makes them part of the grift. They think they’re fooling people.

Blaming the lies lulls us into thinking that this is an education/disinformation problem which, if addressed, will eliminate the violence.

These folks aren’t deluded. They’ve learned from their leaders that violence and lying are the route to power.

For most of my life I thought these problems could be solved by education. I no longer do. As far as I can tell, about 30% of the population believes that getting away with grifts and bullying people is proof of power and leadership that should be respected, worshiped, and emulated.

We can’t educate these folks. We can only build a society that ensures that they cannot gain control. Unfortunately, the entire human race has largely failed to do so, and we’re suffering the consequences on a planetary scale.

Every day we act as though they don’t *know* that the elections were valid, is a day we risk losing the fight for democracy, equality, and a stable environment.

#brazil #JAN6

@nazgul I think this is basically correct - reactionaries push the boundaries of what can be 'gotten away with' until society sets and enforces a boundary.

https://freeradical.zone/@pinsk/109605046176616314

Danny (@[email protected])

@[email protected] my sense is the reactionary supporters and benefactors of the GOP all assume everybody is as corrupt as their individual circumstances allow, and that 'getting away' with whatever loophole or imprecision the law or convention allows is simply the point of participating in society - their conservatism is fundamentally an antisocial belief system. When the press or the law come around to enforce the law or social conventions, they view it as an expression of political bias.

Free Radical