What do you think is in general the better solution?
(not every case ofc!)
What do you think is in general the better solution?
(not every case ofc!)
@Azt3c In the Netherlands often highways get funneled into a smaller road and at some point to a roundabout!
that also works :D
but yeah, that seems better
And you have these statistics from where?
Did you watch the video? Did you see the stats on how many fewer FATAL accidents there were?
Both drivers were able to get out of their cars by themselves. Not by far fatal.
Are you just to lazy to actually watch the video???

that wouldn't be fair! It would win easily! 😇@stux In America, I feel like no one here knows how to drive through them. Makes sense, it was never taught in Driver’s Ed when I grew up. I learned how to drive through roundabouts via the now defunct Ambuchannel 112.
I feel like 100% of the time around roundabouts, I have to be cautious of other drivers. Even when I’m inside the roundabout and have right of way. Then again, I’ve seen near miss accidents on freeway onramps that have a yield sign because apparently people don’t know how to yield either ;-;
Roundabouts are awesome when people know how to use them to keep traffic flowing. But people are kumquats.
Absolutely, Roundabouts slow traffic down yet keep it moving. Lights have all sorts of issues.
I'm pretty sure studies have shown that Roundabouts are many times more efficient, as long as people use them properly.
I thunk I actually get more frustrated at Roundabouts than Lights because I'm like "you could have gone 8 times dickhead"
You need to watch the whole roundabout, not just the car you're technically meant to give way to.
@stux it depends on the situation. On quieter roads the answer is definitely roundabouts, because it keeps the traffic flowing. On busy intersections, traffic lights are probably safer.
There is an issue with roundabouts and cyclists though; I'm aware of one roundabout not far from me (Drenewydd, Powys, the McDonald's junction) which was changed to traffic lights, and I'm told it was because the roundabout was too dangerous for cyclists. It was better for cars as a roundabout.
That poll should be asked separately to car drivers and pedestrians...
@stux it really depends on the situation and implementation.
Most roundabouts in the UK are designated for maximum speed and flow of car traffic. Which when trying to navigate as not car traffic is utterly hostile.
@stux 8000-lb vehicles cannot easily turn at 75 mph. Nor can drivers manage the contents of a 50-piece McNuggets and a 64-oz soda or latte under high centrifugal loads.
Roundabouts will severly curtail pedestrian mortality, unduly burden our pension and healthcare systems, and flood our high schools and colleges with high enrollments, while bankrupting the makers of miniature caskets and cremation urns.
@stux Not to exaggerate... but I truly think a huge amount of America's problem policing is actually partly to do with the lack of roundabouts!
The constant need for cross sections with either lights or stop signs, even when at very small sites with little traffic, creates a constant climate of low level rule breaking where people roll through because it doesn't seem to matter.
That in turn creates endless opportunities for pretextual traffic stops, often for biased reasons!