One of the most influential rap songs of all time (Ether) contained a homophobic slur. Nas took a lot of criticism for this decades later. So he now performs the song without the slur👍🏿

Lizzo released a track with an ableist slur. She took heat for this on Twitter too. She apologized, and re-cut the song without the slur👍🏿

Conversations about what a person said, are valid.

You don't get "cancelled" for mis-speaking. It's the doubling down.

*edit: Nas didn't re-release. There's a clean version.

I really don't care if QTs happen on this site, or don't happen. What's much more informative and important to me, is how this conversation is unfolding, and what is prioritized. I've heard everything from "The Black perspective isn't real" to "You Twitter refugees!" from folks with account create dates in November, talking to Black folk here since 2017🤷🏿‍♂️

People are talking about QTs the same way they talk about 4chan and Kiwi farms. I don't know how to explain to people how ridiculous that is.

There are valid reasons to have QTs and to not have them. Safety is a valid concern. But this prioritization of fake civility, is not good at all. This ignoring the Black perspective, is also no good.

There are folks more upset at @QasimRashid for sharing how migrants were harmed and put in real danger on Christmas Eve, than they are upset at Abbott for doing the harming. In some folks' eyes, the bigger misstep is Qasim harshing the Christmas vibes. I don't know how to explain that this is bad.

I've told folks for years, that I'm not that concerned about the Nazis, because they're not the problem. Don't focus on the Nazis. Focus on the white folk that you have around you when the Nazis show up.

So consider this permission to unfollow. It's cool! Honestly. I don't judge anyone for wanting to ignore all the pain in the world, and not wanting to do anything about it. I post about racism, transphobia, and sexism, and more specifically, actions we can take to reduce them.

There are literally hundreds of millions of white folk that do want to hear about ways we can reduce all of those bad things. I work with them. We don't need everyone on every issue. It's cool.

But don't ask me "What do you mean Mastodon is not welcoming to Black folk?" And then in the very next breath, say, "Yeah, yeah, I'm sure Black folk are mistreated, but I don't want to hear about it! CW that garbage! It's making me sad!" Just be real, and only say the second part.

@mekkaokereke not necessarily on you to explain this, but I'd be super interested in a black perspective (not that there is only one...) on when CWs ARE useful.

I figure that they should not be used to hide politics, as that lets privileged people ignore real issues (and they can use filtering/blocking for that anyway..).

But it does seem useful for e.g. cases of sexual abuse that might trigger PTSD. I'm not sure were the line is though. Non-systemic stuff? Discussion of individual events?

@naught101 @mekkaokereke I can’t speak from direct experience with racism, but I can offer a trauma informed-perspective informed by both personal experience with ableism and professional experience doing health equity advocacy for a bicultural behavioral health center:
H/t goes to my colleague, our Director of Training & Compliance, who is someone with lived experience of racial & ethnic violence & an experienced DEI Leader/Facilitator. 1/2
@naught101 @mekkaokereke
TW: are useful for specific, graphic examples of things that my cause people who have experienced them to relive their trauma resulting in heightened stress & anxiety, possible dissociation, & other signs of physiological & psychological responses to active danger.
CW: are useful for some discussions of personal experiences w/trauma, abuse, discrimination, and other forms of personal and/or systemic oppression, coercion, violence, etc…
@naught101 @mekkaokereke When talking about systems of power that drive discrimination, and the broad impact those systems have on institutionally oppressed communities, we sometimes talk about the need to distinguish between safe spaces and brave spaces. Because these are conversations we need to have even though they may make people uncomfortable. We need to be uncomfortable to understand how our actions either serve to maintain or dismantle these systems.
@naught101 @mekkaokereke
Addendum:
Safe spaces serve the needs of people who belong to one or more systemically discriminated community. They give people who live with everyday oppression a place away from people who have relatively more power and privilege.
Brave spaces may include community guidelines about respect and letting go of judgement, but the understanding is there will be discomfort. The goal is to work through discomfort and learn from it. 1/1