One of the most disturbing arguments I've seen against having a quote boost #qt feature:

Unlike a reply, quote tweets allow people to discus *what other people have said* Not reply to that person but make what they have said a topic of discussion.

People examining the discourse of others is troubling? (even if they can opt out, no, this shouldn't happen the argument goes, between even "consenting adults" *that's* how wicked it is)

It's... fascinating.

@futurebird The idea that you should have to talk to someone rather than about their post of public importance is so batshit and contrary to the way the real world works.

Imagine if students were assigned to @ authors over and over rather than writing about their books. 🤦

@futurebird I think their hidden assumption is that there should not be things of public importance here.

That everything here should be "politics free" interpersonal spaces for hobbies and feel-good stuff and everyone should ignore that the person they're engaging with about their hobbies is a nazi as long as they don't bring it up. 😠

@dalias

I get that feeling too. Especially from one user who accused me of "dogpiling" him when I'd replied with a question and literally one other person had also replied. (and I didn't even boost his post, because while it had some pretty clear racist subtex, I wasn't certain if that was what was going on, and I wanted to ask some questions and try to understand)

But, just because the response involved the topic of race it was a "dogpile" to him.

I wasn't even being critical of the guy!

@futurebird Sometimes I feel like after some big instances get good quoting ux, we should launch honeypot "we do not support quoting and won't federate with anyone who does!" instances just to get rid of these folks. 😂
@dalias @futurebird Believe it or not someone did say that in the journalist thread which I thought was somewhat over the top.
@sri @futurebird Well they're basically the folks who were willing to leave Twitter (at a time it was run relatively well, even!) for a suburban platform with basically no users and nothing of public relevance on it, because they wanted a whiter/"apolitical" space. So I think they're a good chance they'd do it again, just hopping to a gated community on the fediverse.
@sri @futurebird Keep in mind not only did they run for a whiter space; they did it during a time of rapidly rising fascism (2017-2019) when Twitter was one of the main fronts of the information war to challenge that.
@dalias @sri @futurebird As someone who facilitates spaces for a wide range of perspectives, I believe that a platform can serve and function for a wide range of ways of interacting with it and a wide range of cultures, and it can be hard for someone in 1 culture to envision the experience of others. Hoping we can make this corporate-free space work for the many in many different ways.