@argumento @StevenBeschloss Of course that war was entered into by Americans because of bad information given to the U.S There was lying and manipulation done by other parties with axes to grind. There was also the 9/11 attack on the U.S. and stupidly there was the belief that Iraq was somehow implicated in that. I was against that war and said so much to many but of course it happened and many now regret it ever did happen and wish we were not all lied to.
@argumento @StevenBeschloss This war and that war are of course very different.
The United States is defending a free nation which has sought our assistance Russia attacked Ukraine and continues to attack it. It's desire is to terrorize, oppress and murder. Russia barbaric attack was unwarranted and is totally ignoble and without merit
@argumento @StevenBeschloss NATO is the good guys in this instance.
@MaryMRedoutey @argumento @StevenBeschloss there are no good guys. There is no Superman. They are all Lex Luthor.
@merlecat @argumento @StevenBeschloss
I disagree with that statement.
In my view the one who arbitrarily attacks another is at fault and is the antagonist and the one defending one's homeland against incursion is the protagonist.
We perhaps may just disagree but it isn't whataboutism or misinformation.
@MaryMRedoutey @argumento @StevenBeschloss
You think Puti attacked Ukraine “arbitrarily”
That’s part of the problem. A lack of understanding of the conflict.
I am in no way defending Putin, but this invasion was not arbitrary.
@merlecat @argumento @StevenBeschloss When there is a preemptive strike, in my view it can be nothing but arbitrary.
It was in fact preemptive and was in fact unjust and immoral in my view. Putin, the former KGB Agent, had the goal to attain lost imperialistic power as he resented the fall of the USSR
He was in effect like the old boyfriend unwilling to treat his ex as a free agent, seeing her talk to others as a threat because of his own narcissistic insecurities.
@MaryMRedoutey @argumento @StevenBeschloss unjust and immoral? Yes. Of course. Arbitrary? Absolutely not. In fact there are those that have been warning of this exact scenario for years.

@merlecat @argumento @StevenBeschloss It appears you are looking at a different definition of the word than I was when I used the word arbitrary.
And oddly enough there are several... One could also argue that Putin is always arbitrary I suppose as this is also a definition of the word:

Arbitrary
having unlimited power; uncontrolled or unrestricted by law; despotic; tyrannical:an arbitrary government

I wouldn't go that far though.