So, things are getting kind of interesting.

In the last few hours the new user rate has jumped from around 1000 per hour to more than 2500 per hour. While this is a big increase, it is nothing like back on Nov 18, when the average was over 10,000 new users per hour.

Still, this does feel like a new surge. Mastodon struggled back in November with the last wave. Let's hope we're ready for what comes next. Big shoutout to the amazing admins and moderators all over the world!

#twittermigration

So, definitely a wave.

For the last eight hours Mastodon has been averaging over 3000 new users per hour, on track for 75K new users today. Overall, thanks to the amazing work of instance operators, the system seems to be running well, however there is definitely more lag than usual.

This new user rate, while high, is nowhere near what Mastodon experienced on Nov 18, when a quarter million users joined in one day. Still, this influx is very taxing on system administration.

#twittermigration

The surge continues.

Averaging 3000 to 4000 new users per hour. Mastodon continues to run pretty smoothly. Over 70,000 new users in the last 24 hours puts us on track for over 80,000 today.

Great appreciation for Mastodon instance operators! Most instances are funded entirely through donations, so if you can swing it, think about supporting your instance. Check out the /about page (eg https://[instance name]/about) for a donation link.

#twittermigration

Looks like the new user rate is slowing down somewhat, but still elevated.

For the last couple hours Mastodon added around 2000 users per hour. The surge peaked at 78K users in one 24 hour period.

While there have been a few slowdowns, Mastodon has handled this surge well. The volume was not as high as before, there are many more servers now, and instance administration is more experience and are better prepared.

Great job everyone and welcome to all the #NewUsers.

#twittermigration

@mastodonmigration Watch what happens when media companies realise they can set up their own instances.
@thisMattWilson @mastodonmigration what would be advantage of doing this? Asking as a Mastodon novice. Cc. @gavinsblog @schlink
@donieosullivan Yea it would lots of sense from a security and maintenance pov. Also own servers = own rules.
@gavinsblog so have it that only the reporters from those outlets could sign up? If they opened it to others it would become a content moderation issue?
@donieosullivan yes you would fully control who can create accounts on the instance (id imagine best to just have CNN staff), but still be able to interact with users on other instances (though people could block, say, all CNN staff on the instance in one go).
@gavinsblog could be an interesting one for @oliverdarcy’s newsletter. Speaking of which, Oliver, when is Reliable Sources getting its own Mastodon account?
@donieosullivan @oliverdarcy Mastodon is big enough now that it would actually make lots of sense for newsrooms to establish and maintain their own instances - it's needed for work anyway now and you're not subject to the various whims/policies of specific admins on whatever various instances reporters are signed up to.
@gavinsblog @donieosullivan Users can mute an entire server, not block it. Server admins can block (defederate from) other servers.
Minor difference, I know.
@gavinsblog @donieosullivan It also means verification is implicit by having an account on that instance, see e.g. how the German government runs their own I stance (https://social.bund.de) and only has official accounts on it. (e.g. @bsi )
social.bund.de

Dies ist der Mastodon-Server der Bundesbeauftragten für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit (BfDI).

Mastodon hosted on social.bund.de