@jkosseff Please help me understand that sentiment. Why is Twitter the best way to promote journalists' work? Facebook is massively bigger and early evidence from @briankrebs suggests that Mastadon is already driving more traffic to his articles than Twitter did, apparently because the follows are apples/oranges to Twitter follows.
At the urging of a few folks here, I decided to run a test to see which social networks clicked through most on this week's scoop about a hack of the FBI's InfraGard program. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2022/12/fbis-vetted-info-sharing-network-infragard-hacked/ LinkedIn tells me I have ~100k followers there. 80 Linkedin users commented on that story, but it looks like only about 25 of them actually clicked the link the first 24h! A number equal to about 2 percent of my 350k Twitter followers clicked on the story (6600). In contrast, the story posted here generated 3300 impressions in the same time period, even though I had (at the time) only about 15,000 followers. Also, That 3300 number would probably have been higher, but for the fact that I forgot to add the versioning link and edited that into it afterwards. That tells me that, for now at least, engagement on Mastodon is significantly higher than on either LinkedIn or Twitter.