just saw two different sources refer to <b> as "the Bring Attention To element" and i am losing it
in a better world we could have had a <bat> tag
i cannot find a single version of the html spec that calls it "the bring attention to element"
4.1 just calls it "B" and puts it in the font styling tag category
5 and onwards call it "b" and put it in the general text shit category
3.2 is the same as 4.1 except there's a fancy texture in the background
2.0 just calls it italic
please take a look at the HTML 3.2 spec and its fancy background texture https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/SPSD-html32-20180315/
HTML 3.2 Reference Specification

fr though where does MDN get all these names for every element

why does <del> have a name but <ins> does not

why was I reported for this post and the john mastodon one
I wish they had left a note because I can't think of what they thought was wrong with this post
@codl Other possibilities for this area are a link to a page that is more useful for the Java-ignorant browser, or text that taunts the user for not having a Java-compatible browser.
@codl idk maybe mdn came up with it themselves..?
@niss it's starting to look likely
@codl @niss mdn also insists that <i> stands for "Idiomatic Text"
@codl isn't that just <em>
@codl along with "idiomatic text" and "unarticulated annotation"
@codl i is the I Think You Should Look At This element
@codl I feel like <marquee> would better fit
@codl You're making that up. You HAVE to be making it up.
<b>: The Bring Attention To element - HTML: HyperText Markup Language | MDN

The <b> HTML element is used to draw the reader's attention to the element's contents, which are not otherwise granted special importance. This was formerly known as the Boldface element, and most browsers still draw the text in boldface. However, you should not use <b> for styling text or granting importance. If you wish to create boldface text, you should use the CSS font-weight property. If you wish to indicate an element is of special importance, you should use the <strong> element.

MDN Web Docs
@codl Every day we stray further from the Light.
@chartier MDN also insists <i> stands for "idiomatic text"
@codl it’s bold of them to say that!
@codl Sounds like you fell pretty -- <strong> -- about it?
@codl the <i> element is the "I am bringing attention to" element
@codl gotta keep that xhtml-era fetish for semantic elements alive since no one was convinced that <strong> was inherently better since it didn't refer to a visual style like "bold" does :P