I hope we're all prepared for yet another wave of discourse about the ways in which the cultural norms of mastodon do and do not enable some users to be their full selves on this platform.

I'm treating this as a kind of inevitability because it is clear that the broader Fediverse has not learned from the previous wave or the waves that preceded it. And this is in spite of claims from some mastodonians that an influx of users will bring change.

Put simply, something we're going to have to reckon with is the centrality and stability of desired modes of conduct on this platform, specifically as they are policed and enforced through the technical apparatus of the platforms.

What this means is newcomers who point out the cultural weirdness of the space won't be QTed to oblivion, but they will find their mentions inundated by "well meaning" mastodonians who are trying to explain "the way things are."

This explanation serves to reinforce the very norms of conduct, the very cultural norms, that newcomers will struggle against. Further, this explanation will often treat these norms as unquestioned goods, as a moral order that cannot and should not be transgressed.

Put simply, these explanations will place the onus on the newcomer to "change or die," or; "find another server" without recognizing the ways that they are actually denying the very premises of mastodon they claim to uphold.

Insofar as long time mastodonians, and newcomers who're comfortable with these norms will persist in this kind of behavior, we're more likely going to see "balkanization" among instances at best; ghettoization at worst as people self-isolate through instance creation in some pretty unproductive ways.

Moreover, given mastodon's history with instances run by folks of color, this is a Very Bad thing.

That said, this is a kind of "doom and gloom" prediction. But, in my view, it is one that is very likely to come true given the way that the cultural tendency of mastodonians is to treat the platform and its social arrangements as an unquestioned good, specifically in comparison to the bird site. In so doing, mastodonians resist change on the basis that it would invite the same problems that plagued twitter, albeit in a new form.

Moreover, this treatment of the social and technical structure of mastodon as an unquestioned good also leads to the rapid problematization of folks who do not treat the social and technical structures as the unquestioned goods they're "supposed" to be.

To quote Sara Ahmed, "when you pose a problem, you become a problem," and in becoming the problem, the solution is to make the user go away. Or "start your own instance."

That said, there's honestly a real easy way out of this: assume that not every user has the same experience of mastodon's social and technical structures as an unquestioned good. Assume that different users' backgrounds shape how they interact with the platform and these interactions might be vastly different than yours. And assume that their experiences are valid.
@shengokai I wish I could boost this twice.