Philosophers interested in neuroscience! Is there a good overarching book or review paper you recommend on 'neuro-adjacent' philosophy? I'm thinking of topics like consciousness, agency, qualia, etc.

An overview of analytic, continental and non-western approaches would be nice.

#Neuroscience #Philosophy

@NicoleCRust @DrYohanJohn

Some resources:

Wayne Wu's review of the neuroscience of consciousness:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-neuroscience/

Evan Thompson is good at combining eastern and western traditions (e.g., his Waking, Dreaming, Being):
https://evanthompson.me/articles/

I review some relevant material in early chapters and try to make some progress on computation and consciousness in the last chapter of Neurocognitive Mechanisms (OUP 2020).

The Neuroscience of Consciousness (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

What I would love is a historical approach to philosophy of mind in the 20th century. How did we get to "the hard problem", "qualia", "Mary's room" etc? Most neuroscientists, if they are even aware of this stuff, have no idea about the history. I only have Wikipedia-level knowledge of most of it.

@Gualtiero @NicoleCRust

@DrYohanJohn @Gualtiero @NicoleCRust Oh yeah--what was I thinking? Yes, Andy Clark. For history, one alternative would be to go to the sources via an anthology designed for courses. Chalmers has one, Alter and Howell have one, and there are others.
@marshall_0i @DrYohanJohn @Gualtiero @NicoleCRust Second the Chalmers anthology for a collection that will cover most of the relevant bits of history

Ooh that's a good idea. Any recommendations for philosophy of mind course syllabi? Is there a place these are uploaded?

@dbarack @marshall_0i @Gualtiero @NicoleCRust

@joemo @DrYohanJohn @dbarack @marshall_0i @Gualtiero @NicoleCRust If by “well-footnoted” you mean “no footnotes “ then, yes, that allegation is accurate.
@petemandik @joemo @DrYohanJohn @dbarack @Gualtiero @NicoleCRust Mandik's This is Philosophy of Mind is indeed a wonderful book. (For my students, it's about as close to an ideal phil mind textbook as is possible.) I didn't mention it because I don't think of it as historical per se, though of course it covers the classic concepts: dualism, behaviorism, etc., along with other stuff.