1/ Someone asked, "How can basic HTML pages be social media -- and create something resembling the public square?" So here's a thread 🧵

If you were not around to witness the early web, let me explain what it was like.

During the 90s, most websites just used HTML. CSS and JavaScript existed in the latter part of the decade, but they were entirely optional.

The appeal of the web wasn't "rich media". Again, that came later.

What made the web exciting is what also made it social: hyperlinking

2/ The web has become so popular, people forget that an Internet exists apart from the web.

Prior to the web, people were able to host basic .txt files fine on various BBS boards.

What made the web so completely dominant is that none of those other services could hyperlink.

This is so important that the protocol itself is: Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP).

What is hypertext? Text that allows for referencing. Mostly these are hyperlinks.

So why reference? Because referencing is social.

3/ Let's now consider what makes hyperlinking explicitly social.

Virtually every website has a hyperlink. Most of the time, these hyperlinks reference other pages on the site.

But they can do something else: reference pages on OTHER sites.

This is important because visitors to your website don't need to be siloed to your website. They can now become aware of a much wider world of creativity.

Hence why the web was called the World Wide Web.

4/ Now what made the web especially attractive to people was that the sky was the limit in terms of creativity.

Not only could you format text, you could change backgrounds, embed pictures and animations, create tables -- the sky was the limit.

This was the appeal of sites like GeoCities where people could just show off their full creative freedom.

To this day, I feel the early web was more creative and expressive than its current iteration.

5/ If you want to know what this older version of the web looked like, and how it was explicitly social, I recommend browsing through Neocities.

Sites like these were why people literally just surfed the web as a hobby -- because there was so much social creativity going on that it could entertain you for days, weeks, months -- even years.

https://neocities.org/browse

Neocities

Browse Neocities websites by tags, popularity, and recent updates.

6/ Now why do I mention that the web was designed to be social?

Because it's not so apparent now.

Nowadays, a static webpage implies no interaction.

But this was not true of the early web. Rather, the interaction was through static webpages themselves.

People communicated with each other via hyperlinks.

7/ What people forget is that the destruction of Meta and Twitter *doesn't* mean the destruction of the public square.

No, the *web* itself is the public square.

Anyone can set up a simple, basic website.

In fact, it's easier than ever to do this, and it costs very little money.

All you need is hardware.

And guess what? Almost all hardware made within the last 20 years is capable of being a webserver.

A basic website actually is the most accessible of social media tools.

8/ Now I'm not the biggest booster of the web. In fact, I've long since said that the Internet needs to decentralize away from it.

Nevertheless, the web is a tool -- an important tool -- and we'd be remiss if we didn't acknowledge that basic HTML (with hyperlinking) can do a whole lot of things that can address inequality on the Internet.

If you're an activist and you worry about censorship from Meta and Facebook, building your own website and self-hosting it is an incredible tool.

9/ The biggest problem with the Internet nowadays is increasing centralization.

What do I mean by this?

That there's an alarming decrease in sites that people visit on the Internet.

There's a trend to do everything on one site -- or to even bypass the Internet entirely and do it on one app.

In fact, there's a VC-driven race right now to build an "everything app". That's the end goal.

Should we let that happen? No!

This is why we should continue to build websites -- and visit them!

10/ That said, we should never look at the web as the only tool for re-building the public square.

The Internet is bigger than the web.

To work for a more equitable, fair Internet, we need to build for:

1. The Web
2. Email
3. Chat (IRC, XMPP, The Matrix, etc.)
4. Social Media
5. File sharing

We can't let our foot off the gas pedal because certain powers-that-be are trying to do their damnedest to make us forget that the Internet was designed to be decentralized.

Let's give them hell!

/END

@atomicpoet remember listserv email discussion groups! Working since bitnet and from my experiene best 4 profound discussions !
@groms @atomicpoet Remember listserv email discussion groups? I'm still on two or three that have been around since the mid-late 90s. 🤣
@atomicpoet although hardware is cheaper, many residential ISPs actively discourage or forbid running home servers for "security" reasons, IPv6 isn't widely deployed in some countries yet (and some circuits, especially those using LTE SIMs have dynamic IPs operating behind multiple levels of NAT, I counted at least 5 on one UK ISP). Any "DIY web solution" would have to be able to work round this..
@vfrmedia True, and we have to educate ourselves on those workarounds.
@atomicpoet 🤘🏼 This guy gets it.

@atomicpoet

It would be reasonable to start making apps that explicitly dropped the "Mothership" model and acted peer-to-peer. An unfortunate side effect of doing so: Without a mothership, monetizing is a nightmare from hell. You would also have to give up authentication, which can be controlled by capitalist surveillance, or by The State either directly or indirectly by laws and lawsuits. The only way to avoid those is "don't have a locus for doing that."

It would be really cool to see someone create a project like that, but I'm not expecting it until it's too late to bother.

@Romaq Not everything needs to be monetized.

@atomicpoet

True, yes.

Now try getting anything done without it.

@atomicpoet Great thread. I have nothing to add, but this. Hyperlinking was never fully resolved. Nelson's vision of "transclusion" was the ultimate hyperlink, but it was never implemented.
@atomicpoet Finally a good thread about the subject. Built my first website back in 1998 and have been building websites daily ever since. I was hooked in a instant. Internet is amazing.
@atomicpoet
Usenet fits in there also. Pretty much federated forums.
@atomicpoet I think the open source chat app arena is pretty dead. I once tried to find an updated IRC app, and the dev work on all of them had been inactive since sometime around 2015.
@atomicpoet Thanks, Chris, for this very helpful thread. I remembered how learning about hyperlinks was utterly thrilling. We’re still in that stage where tools are invented and put into society before we know how to use them or what they’re even for. I feel like this Twitter tragedy may simply be a major correction. But then, my first experience with virtual community was @TheWELL 🤣

@atomicpoet I maintained a web site for my band in 1996, and I did it using straight HTML, edited in vi - so I'm in tune with you here. I also think Usenet was an incredible resource, and there's really nothing on the web now that comes close to its utility.

Email is vital! It's the "default comms" for me. I can't understand why some people are trying to abandon it. To me it's like the old-fashioned art of letter-writing. It keeps me grounded.

@atomicpoet Even before HTML, we were pretty freaking social on our old BBSs!! Rest in peace Fidonet. ❤️😁
@atomicpoet

It's been centralising for over 20 years.
Maybe the Fediverse is a revivalist movement.
The Internet ethos is decentralised communication.

@atomicpoet,

They will try, but it will not work — especially now that the #fediverse (totally driven by protocols based on open standards) is out of the bag.

IMHO:
The key to all of this lies in loosely-coupling structured data representation with #identity #authenticity and #privacy (which can’t be delivered to an individual via 3rd parties).

@atomicpoet Amen to this. We still maintain linksʼ pages. And sadly, when we go to edit them, we are not adding that many sites. We are removing a lot of dead ones.
@atomicpoet this centralization was also driven by the large social sites preventing deep linking and making linking out nearly impossible. Black holes and roach motels of content.
Welcome to my IPFS phone blog!

This is my IPFS blog running on my android phone and created and maintained on it.

@atomicpoet
If BT had their way a license would be paid to use Hyperlinks as they claimed it infringed a patent but lost the court case. Shows that big business will try to destroy/stifle/control innovative if they can get a buck out of it