🚨🚨🚨 WHAT. THE. ACTUAL. H*LL.

Please boost to get the word out and call your Senators and MOC tomorrow. This can't be ok.
#scotus #clarencethomas #ginnythomas #corruption #uspolitics #fediverse

@murshedz Any word on who introduced that proviso? And can it be made to apply to spouses of House speakers?
@toxtethogrady Haven't seen that information yet. Will be on the lookout and I will share it if I see it.
@murshedz @toxtethogrady
RT @[email protected]
You can find the clearly unconstitutional provision Jane’s referring to, which would keep the identity of #SCOTUS spouses’ employers secret, on p. 2544 of the 4,408-page bill
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR7776EAS-RCP117-70.pdf
@murshedz @toxtethogrady
I'm not a lawyer, and i just skimmed, but it looks like there's an exception for facts that are relevant to a news article, which would be the case for a story regarding corruption.
---
EXCEPTIONS.—Clause (i) shall not apply ... if the information is relevant to and displayed as part of a news story, commentary, editorial, or other speech on a matter of public concern;
---
@mcpinson @murshedz @toxtethogrady Does this exception apply to Ginni? Thus her involvement will be scrutinized?
@Mallulady @mcpinson @murshedz It's nice and murky. Murky enough that this Supreme Court will play havoc with it...