RT @[email protected]

Today the Supreme Court hears arguments in a case that could upend democracy. I argue that for somewhat base reasons, they won't.

On Moore v. Harper and the Independent State Legislature theory: https://samwang.substack.com/p/today-in-the-supreme-court-cynicism

Today in the Supreme Court, cynicism = optimism

The Court seems unlikely to upend democracy - but the reasons may surprise you

Fixing Bugs In Democracy - by Sam Wang

I do think Roberts and Barrett do want to maintain their power to intervene in elections like Greek Gods.

But if this disgraceful theory fails, I think it's because the GOP no longer controls the state legs in MI and PA -- so it's not as attractive.

Thanks, voters!

@lolgop stop it with the tap to reveal content. Nobody is following you that doesn’t want politics. TYVM
@adamburck @lolgop FYI, you can go to the settings for your account and flip a switch to auto reveal CW content. The local mastodon feed gets shorter content but you (and I) don't. Everyone wins.
@grumps @lolgop I don’t think the iOS app can do that, but anyway better to solve problems at the source, no?

@adamburck
@lolgop

Dunno, available energy varies.

@lolgop This is what I’ve been thinking too, sort of. When #scotus agreed to take up this case they anticipated that the midterms would turn out much differently than they actually did. Some of them might still want to go full YOLO on ISL but a couple of them have to be looking at MI, PA, and maybe even AZ and having second thoughts.
@MisuseCase @lolgop That and SCOTUS is in no small part why they did so badly in the midterms. Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas were MVP’s. Kinda wonder if that escapes them.
@MisuseCase @lolgop They're unaccountable, so I doubt they much care.