John Muir is hailed as an environmental hero. He wrote & advocated to protect the “wilderness,” including Yosemite. But the land, Ahwahnee, was already named & loved by the Ahwahneechee people.

Muir wasn’t interested in the original inhabitants. He was a pioneer in the environmental movement, but he was also racist & friends with prominent eugenicists. His complicated legacy is just one of many examples in American #history when environmental protections were at odds with environmental justice.

@Sheril It really is a shame that so many otherwise laudable progressives of that era were tainted by the dominant ideology of white supremacy.
It's taught me not to idolize anyone, and instead draw limited inspiration from them while learning from and discarding their flaws.
@Sheril Eugenics was an element of the American experience in Muir’s era. It was probably more pervasive than most realize or are willing to admit. Putting a positive spin (the modern term) to racist beliefs and philosophy.
@M_C_B52 Same in Australia, as manifest in the " White Australia Policy" and the assumption that Aboriginal People were "dying out" (with a bit of help).
@Sheril Hero worship is one of the many problems with environmentalists. It’s too complicated for toots, but my career left me generally disdainful of the organizations and their ways when I share most of their stated objectives. But if they accept these figures are less than heroes, it’s harder to fundraise by invoking their names.
@Sheril It's really sad how history is "white washed." Muir is hailed as pioneer. He was far from being a good person. #revisionisthistory.
@ablackcatstail @Sheril I wouldn't go so far as to call it revisionist. Muir was certainly a pioneer in the environmental movement and we should give him credit for that, but as a human, he had many flaws. I think it is good that, today, we are viewing Muir, Audubon, and others from that era for who they were and correcting the omissions.
@ablackcatstail @Sheril all people have flaws passing judgment on muir because he doesn't meet modern standards of morality is just dumb
@thedogspaw @ablackcatstail @Sheril there were (white) people then who also didn’t believe in expulsion and genocide, but they didn’t write the histories. Morality hasn’t changed- see what #Humbolt and #Darwin had to say about slavery, for example
@sophie_a2 @ablackcatstail @Sheril i don't think he was in favor of wiping them out most people thought they were helping them by teaching the savages the white ways which they saw as better they thought they were helping them today we can see that was wrong but they didn't know that
@thedogspaw @ablackcatstail @Sheril Lots of people opposed “Indian Removal” in the 19th century. The House of Representatives voted 102 to 97 to pass the Act, and the Senate passed it by 27 to 19. Given the ‘caution’ of politicians, they must have been representing widespread opposition. Lots of people were opposed to slavery, too, in addition to the slaves themselves, of course: look at the opinions of #Humboldt and #Darwin. Morality hasn’t changed.

@thedogspaw @ablackcatstail @Sheril should we disregard the faults of the past? we can point to muir's environmentalism but not forget his eugenicist beliefs.

to ignore his faults and the faults of others is to perpetuate those faults.

@elizabethveldon @thedogspaw @Sheril We should absolutely not ignore their faults. A person's faults are a part of history as much as what they've done right. Ignoring faults is revisionist history.
@ablackcatstail @thedogspaw @Sheril it is also, to me anyway, tragic. we can learn, we can become better. if we choose not to then we never achieve out full potential, we never become fully human as individuals or fully realised as a society or species.
@Sheril So true! Sometimes, opposites thrive in great personalities because they couldn't justify the combination! May be they had no time or they didn't bother?🤔

@Sheril
True - and important context for history.

But we can carry forward environmental principles without fetishizing the person - or debate if other bad views they held negate the good ones.

@Sheril I had no idea. It's odd how much we want people to be perfect and yet most are flawed.
@Sheril I believe most people are partially a product of their times. People having questionable beliefs/knowledge at a time where most people didn’t leave their hometown or where geography isolated is sadly common (Muir wasn’t this). People learned what they were told, learned in school, read or experienced no matter their background. This would be true of Muir. Our world is so much larger and we have access to much more than even the most highly educated people 100+ years ago.
@Sheril we have the privilege of know eugenics is all bullshit. In his time it was considered by even the most educated people because it was touted as scientific knowledge. The latest science. We know it’s been debunked. Everything we know is due to learning as we go so lots of mistakes were made. Many mistakes have been terrible but what matters is if we learn from those mistakes.
@Sheril there has been a fair amount of writing lately attempting to reconcile Muir's love of nature with what looks like a disdain for Aboriginal people. These are contradictions that will take more than a little time to unpack.
@Sheril in the end…we shouldn’t put any person on a pedestal. People today will be looked as as being ignorant if we keep progressing with our knowledge and beliefs. What I do is look at their overall legacy. Hitler is horrible no matter what cause he left behind a legacy of death and hate. Others have a legacy of leaving us with something positive like the NPS or instilling environmentalism. Yet they are not perfect. They are flawed people and should be treated as such.
@Sheril Unsurprised but still heartbreaking
@Sheril Sierra Club admits: Muir was not immune to the racism peddled by many in the early conservation movement. He made derogatory comments about Black people and Indigenous peoples that drew on deeply harmful racist stereotypes, though his views evolved later in his life. As the most iconic figure in Sierra Club history, Muir's words and actions carry an especially heavy weight. They continue to hurt and alienate Indigenous people and people of color.
@Sheril
re John Muir. It's always a bit frustrating when today's Earth activists complain that "they" aren't doing anything. You can't click and it's done. Add Rachel Carson to the list of those who've proclaimed Earth vital & Native Peoples, Teddy Roosevelt etc. Sparks kindled n the past always ignite in the future.

@Sheril

Definitely some problematic behaviors yes. It's also complicated to try to sum up a human life in just a few words.

This article notes a few of the tensions within Muir himself, and / or how he grew over time:
https://www.sfpublicpress.org/john-muir-racial-politics-and-the-restoration-of-indigenous-lands-in-yosemite/

John Muir, Racial Politics and the Restoration of Indigenous Lands

John Muir is such a touchstone and cultural icon that “Civic” took a look at his legacy by traveling to Yosemite National Park.

San Francisco Public Press

@Sheril

Quote:
""Muir called the handful of Miwuk living in Yosemite who had survived a racial genocide “dirty.” But his later writings show that his attitude shifted over time.

"“When he arrived in Alaska” in 1899, Stetson said, “he was accompanied by and guided by Indians. He became incredibly fond of them. He was engaged with Indian cultures that were fully intact. His understanding of their loyalties, their families, their culture in general, was certainly very positive in every way.”""

@Sheril Disregard & disdain of actual inhabitants remains a common flaw in many modern "re-wilding" or "nature preservation" plans, regardless of whether it also includes an element of racism or not. For example plans for Scottish Highlands often show such, despite lack of any "racial' difference (unless you consider the super-rich another race)
@Sheril I attended a middle school named after John Muir. We definitely learned of his advocacy for protecting the wilderness, but the racism? Nope. It’s been decades and that middle school still bears his name. I hope the students are taught a more complete history.
@Sheril interesting problem. How would you proceed?

@Sheril Complicated is right, and these blind spots or even intentional cruelty wrapped up as pragmatism is certainly not limited to USA.

In Finland, there's an equally complicated legacy with Pentti Linkola.

He was an incredible environmental activist and ornithologist and also established the Finnish Natural Heritage Foundation to conserve old growth forests.

His philosophy, however, was undeniably ecofascist, which the racists and fascists use as a "gotcha" to the Left.

@Sheril Indeed, his history is complicated, but you've presented it very simply here. Reading many of the comments in response to your post, many people just take your "racist" label at face value, perhaps not recognizing his historical context and changes in belief over time. I am not saying this to "excuse" Muir but rather to say, yes, let's actually look at the complexities face on, look at what he actually said and did, good and bad. A starting point: https://lithub.com/words-of-hope-and-a-defense-of-john-muir-kim-stanley-robinson-on-his-love-of-the-sierra-nevadas/
Words of Hope, and a Defense of John Muir: Kim Stanley Robinson on His Love of the Sierra Nevadas

The Sierra Nevada mountain range rises high above the eastern boundary of California’s Central Valley. A rocky spine some four hundred miles long, its staggered peaks are wreathed with conifer fore…

Literary Hub
@Sheril Alas No one perfect.
@Sheril unfortunately environmental movements are still pretty white and upper class. Brothers get weird looks and funny questions when we try to join their gatherings, that's just how it is.
@slytanicus6 That must change. Hopefully it’s beginning to.

@Sheril

Well...sort of.

What Muir did and wrote in California, esp wrt indigenous people, was racist and we should call it that. Worse, it formed the conceptual underpinnings for what NPS did and continues to do to deny indigenous folks access/co-management in their own homelands. Big blind spot for the white environmentalist movement and the feds.

That said: it's worth reading Muir's last work, about Alaska, to see how his views/awareness changed as he aged.

People do learn.

@sarae I share this not to wholly condemn Muir, but rather because a lot of folks I speak with about climate change & conservation assume environmental sustainability & environmental justice always go hand in hand.

They can, but too often, they haven’t.

@Sheril

Oh, they absolutely do not, and that's definitely a point worth raising. There's also a strong culture of contrarian/not-listening behavior within the "environmental" movement that is simultaneously a strength...and makes it hard to bring depth to conversations. David Brower is perhaps the classic example.

But I want us talking about whole stories, because I think we all learn more that way, so I try to lean in and encourage that where I can.

@Sheril @sarae
You might not have wholly condemned him, but it seems like you were basically implying that Muir was a proto-Nazi who was completely apathetic to the barbarous treatment of Indigenous peoples and the theft of their lands.

Could he have been a better advocate for environmental justice? Of course!
Could we all? Absolutely!
Is there a better way to spotlight the disconnect that often occurs between sustainability and justice? I'd argue there is!

@Sheril @sarae
"As we join together to create a more inclusive and just environmental movement, and to bring about needed societal transformations to increase environmental protections, racial equality and social justice, defining people by the trajectory of their lives, rather than by the worst or lowest versions of themselves across the history of their experience, is going to be important...

@Sheril @sarae
...Why? Because we are going to need people to evolve, to become better, if we are going to succeed. John Muir’s evolution as a person can serve as an example of this."

-Aaron Mair, Chad Hanson and Mary Ann Nelson.

https://johnmuirproject.org/2020/07/who-was-john-muir-really/

Who Was John Muir, Really?

We have often been conditioned to think idealistically about great historical figures as icons, institutions, or superheroes, despite the historical context of their times, but that’s a mistake. They are all people, and their lives have arcs that may involve major changes and transformations. They are a product of their upbringing but it is up...

@Sheril All colonisation by Europeans rested on the idea that everything on Earth was gifted by god - to white people. As a gift directly from god, their entitlement overrode any claim Indigenous People might have.
@Sheril and there is Robert Marshall and his poetical „The Problem of the Wilderness”.

@Sheril there's a walking route here in scotland named after him. I walked about 20 miles of it, i was not impressed.

i felt i was walking on the bones of indigenous people.