@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss Because people have control over the course of a revolution, elections are a rubber stamp for whomever the parties want in charge.
The constitution allows for only small incremental reforms that don't threaten those in power, you can't build a new system under the old one.
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss Lets run with the assumption the American Revolution was not a real revolution then. I disagree with that assessment, but since it was a revolution fought by ordinary people on behalf of the landowner class it was clearly not a democratic revolution anyway. The constitution it produced reflects this.
If that's the case, isn't it time the US had a democratic revolution?
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss If you believe in US elections you may find this study interesting.
@SocialistStan @StevenBeschloss I am aware of this study. But I repeat: If you can't win an election, why do you think you can win a revolution? Are bullets cheaper than ballots? Do you think "the people" will still be in charge when the dust settles?
Do you know how the Iranian Revolution started, just to pick one example? Do not call up that which you cannot put back down.
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss You can't elect a system out of power, that requires a revolution.
Calling up what can't be put back down is exactly the point, destroy the old system and a new one will emerge.
Portugal 1974, Rojava 2012, Ukraine 2014, just a few examples of democratic revolutions, there are scores of others.
@SocialistStan @StevenBeschloss When a revolution comes, it is too late to stop it. The avalanche will have already begun, it will be too late for the pebbles to vote. I'm told Lenin once said that anybody who makes plans for after the revolution is a reactionary. Are you a reactionary?
And does Ukraine still have corporations?
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss Ukraine doesn't have a Russian puppet regime anymore, it would have been great if their revolution had been anti-capitalist as well, but that was for them to decide. The 'pebbles' voted as you might say...
Lenin was an authoritarian who made plans for after the revolution he successfully carried out and made himself dictator.
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss
One day there will be a revolution in this country and we'll have a democracy, till then I have nothing to say to someone who won't discuss in good faith and who wants to back a constitution where 400 people control the lives of 400 million.
Have fun living under your oligarchs you fucking conservative, you deserve each other.
As for YOUR constitution, don't expect me to pledge allegiance to it and you won't have a problem.
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss But, keep in mind "all enemies, foreign and domestic." God willing, I will not be the first to break faith.
Sounds like an Oathkeeper, lol. Like I said, have fun keeping faith with your oligarchs, I won't. As long as you defend the establishment and its constitution you are denying millions the ability to live under a system of their own choosing and to have an authentic 'yes' under democracy.
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss We are not on the same side. You're a conservative whose pledged to the old order of things and I'm a libertarian socialist that wants to over throw the old system and institute a democracy.
It's my mistake thinking I could or should dialog with you. Before I block you I want you to know, conservatism has no future, you're wasting your time.
@DrDanMarshall @StevenBeschloss
Revolutions work.