Now seems like a good time to talk about how far-right extremists are using the Overton Window theory to force their ideas into the mainstream. The premise here is that today’s fringe ideas/beliefs can become tomorrow’s normal by shifting the boundaries of acceptable discourse. You do that by introducing people to more & more extreme ideas, so everything else seems reasonable in comparison.

eg, when “praising Hitler” becomes the comparison point, low-key bigotry suddenly doesn’t seem so bad. 1/

Elon Musk seems to think it’s ok to allow white supremacists and Nazis on Twitter as long as they aren’t tweeting overt hate speech, but the problem with that is that it inherently sends a message that their ideas are worthy of consideration — even though we know the endpoint of those ideas is violence, death, and ultimately genocide. Those ideas are not, in fact, worthy of consideration. 2/
The concern isn’t that letting Nazis back on Twitter (or any other major platform) is going to make people suddenly start thinking Nazis are good. The concern is that when people get used to hearing their ideas, other extreme ideas start sounding kind of reasonable and even acceptable. That’s the Overton Window, and it explains a lot about what’s going on right now. Far-right extremists use this tactic more effectively than any other group I’ve ever seen. 3/

@rvawonk Beyond Twitter or a given platform's responsibility and role in combating extremist ideas, what can rank-and-file people like us do to effectively counter it other than rage tweeting against it?

I'm assuming rage tweeting is not the answer?

@trentbaur @rvawonk You can also help with in-person situations by staying aware and pushing back right away on bigoted comments and "jokes."

I like the low-confrontation friendly wince-and-laugh "ooo, I think that came out wrong; did you want to rephrase that?" and the Socratic "I don't get it; why is that funny?"

Both help shift the Overton window in the right direction in public (workspaces, friend groups, etc), and you can make them more confrontational as needed

@OrganizedTRex @trentbaur @rvawonk

When I was a young child, my uncle made a racist joke that I, being a child, truly DID NOT GET. So I asked the adults WHY the "joke" was funny. There was some real uncomfortable silence, then some real uncomfortable "explaining"

I don't remember my uncle telling racist jokes after that, but maybe he just avoided telling them in front of me.

Several of my uncles were KKK, one overt, several covert.

@ZhiZhu @OrganizedTRex @rvawonk I don't want to chase these people back into the shadows, I want them to understand that their views are bankrupt and fundamentally flawed.

But shame is never going to accomplish that.

@rvawonk @OrganizedTRex @ZhiZhu @trentbaur I suggest you concern yourself less with the mental states of bigoted people and more with the safety of people targeted by them.

@fivetonsflax @rvawonk @OrganizedTRex @ZhiZhu It's not the mental state of bigoted people. It's trying to head off the overthrow of democracy by the increasing numbers of bigoted people. We're not going to shun our way out of this.

Do you not understand what is going on? Hand waving it as "sympathizing with racists" is myopic and short sighted.

@trentbaur @ZhiZhu @rvawonk @OrganizedTRex I didn’t say anything about sympathizing.

You’re 180° wrong about the dynamics of this stuff. Pushing the hard core bigots back into the shadows is exactly how we win. And for people in the mushy middle, what’s important isn’t what they believe, but which of their multiple identities is most salient at any given time.

We must make it safer to stand up and say, I am a proud worker! and less safe to stand up and say, I am a proud white man!

@fivetonsflax @ZhiZhu @rvawonk @OrganizedTRex I’m not talking about having a sit down with Fuentes. I’m talking specifically about that mushy middle. Our job is to persuade them to reject authoritarianism. And right now, from my perspective, the left does a shitty job doing that because they consider themselves above the need to persuade. Because our values are “self-evident.”
But that’s not good enough anymore.
@trentbaur @ZhiZhu @OrganizedTRex @rvawonk And you don’t think helping people discover that their racism is shameful is a constructive form of persuasion?!
@fivetonsflax @ZhiZhu @OrganizedTRex @rvawonk It’s a question of how you do it. If accusing someone of being a Nazi does the trick, go for it. But my experience is that it never works.
How do you react to being shamed? Do you thoughtfully consider what the other person is saying? Or do you get defensive, shut down and push back?
Shaming makes one feel powerful, that’s why we like doing it. But it’s dreadfully ineffective at effecting change.

@trentbaur @fivetonsflax That's why I brought up Derek Black. He said that the shunning and resulting isolation are what made him open to learning from his Jewish classmates.

It's not "shun and done" (LOL). We make sure bigoted behavior is widely recognized as abhorrent (this is the "moving the Overton Window back toward sanity" part) because our first priority is making society safe and welcoming for the targets of bigotry.

*Then* we educate friends/family,
1/2

@OrganizedTRex @trentbaur For every Derek Black, there are a thousand casual racists who shut up when they are shown that their opinions are rejected by ordinary people.

@fivetonsflax @OrganizedTRex With all due respect, I believe things have changed over the years. In the 90s, I think shame could be very effective. 5 years ago? Less so. Today? Much less so.

Not saying shame has no effect. But it was shifted (As the Overton Window has shifted over time) and we need to be cognizant of this fact and adjust accordingly.

I think we've got a big overlapping Venn diagram between us. I think I'm just saying, "Both, And..."