QTs are overall bad & their absense helps make Mastodon 'nicer' than Twitter

as an ex-troll I know QTs are THE main weapon in the arsenal of harassment, call it the 'LibsOfTicToc Effect'.

On Twitter a malicious QT by a large account with high engagement exposes the OP to 10's or 100's of thousands of hostile eyes, with predictable results. The scale is different here, but the usage would not be

yes there are benign, helpful uses for QTs, as there are for most dangerous tools but imo the negatives FAR outweigh the positives

anyone who's been on twitter knows probably 80% of QTs are negative interactions and de facto invitations for followers to dogpile a target, to the point where larger accounts not wanting to be responsible for one will post screenshots instead of QTing directly

so as QT's were an invention of the users, those same users eventually realized that automating the process changed it dramatically for the worse, and the screenshot post is a mitigating evolution

and yes I saw that post by that Twitter guy who says THE NUMBERS SHOW that they don't increase harassment, and to that I say LMFAOOO

why the fuck do you think EVERY troll used them? bc due to some blind spot in Twitter Support you can say shit in a QT that would get you INSTA BANNED if it were a reply

I assume that wouldn't be the case here, but just speaking to the idiocy of Twitter employees, who have never and still do not understand the platform, AT ALL

@ancient_catbus you can maximize for engagement or minimize for toxicity but you can't do both. Turns out that toxicity is really engaging. That's part of what makes it toxic
@logo @ancient_catbus imo idk about what twitter’s Data says, denying new transplants their old posting habits will force them to be less fuckin dull