I'm going to try to make #WeedyWednesday a thing, in an effort to more regularly post something interesting about #weedscience. For the inaugural thread, I'm going to discuss one of my favorite areas of research that I and my students have been working on for ~10 years: shade avoidance.
#plants #plantscience #agriculture #weeds

"Shade avoidance" is not shade!

This is the most common misconception whenever I talk about this topic. So let's start there. I think most peple intuitively understand that if a plant is in the shade, it'll grow differently. Plants need light to photosynthesize and grow normally, so if something is blocking the light, plants will alter their growth to 'find' the sun.

Shade (or lack of light) changes the way plants grow.

But today, we're not talking about shade; we're not decreasing the amount of light that plants are getting.

Today, we're talking about a thing plants can do to *avoid* being shaded. They do this in *anticipation* of being shaded. This is why we call it 'shade avoidance'.

Plants - like everything else - reflect light. They reflect a lot of green light, and that's why we perceive them as green.

Plants also reflect light outside our visible spectrum. A particular wavelength of light that plants reflect, we're going to call "far-red" light. Plant leaves reflect a LOT of far-red light.

Plants *absorb* lots of red light (they use the visible red wavelengths for photosynthesis).

So light reflected from plant leaves has a very low ratio of red light to far-red light (R:FR).

The R:FR light ratio is an important environmental cue for lots of plant responses - flowering, germination, others. But we're going to focus on just the shade avoidance bit. There's a lot of previous research about this topic, that I'm not going to present. We're going to focus mostly on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), because it is the crop I study most.

When small plants sense a low R:FR, most of them try to grow tall! They 'know' that there are plants nearby because of the light environment, and so they 'know' they're going to get shaded by other plants if they grow normally. So they change the way they grow - they sacrifice thigs, like roots and leaves, to grow taller stems. This is 'shade avoidance'. It is literally a mechanism to preemptively avoid being shaded by neighboring plants.

Sugar beets, the plant we study, can't really grow tall. And sacrificing roots is a problem since that's the part of the plant we harvest. So if you expose a sugar beet plant (or other beets like garden beets) to the low R:FR from neighboring plants, the results are pretty devastating to root yield. Here's the first study we published on this topic. The bottom line: having plants nearby sugar beet reduced root yield by 70%!

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E53BFF306A6860DFCDD09D2D030729FB/S004317451900002Xa.pdf/shade_avoidance_cues_reduce_beta_vulgaris_growth.pdf

70% root biomass reduction just because there are plants growing nearby was pretty astounding to me. But it also isn't totally relevant to the real world, because sugar beet farmers don't just let weeds grow the whole season - our system in that study allowed the 'weeds' to remain all season. Farmers usually go remove weeds with tillage and/or herbicides by the time the beets are around 2 to 4 weeks old. So we did another study looking at the impact of just the early season exposure to weeds.

In this study, if the weeds were present from sugar beet emergence until the beets had 2 true leaves (a couple weeks after emergence), then sugar beet root biomass was reduced by 32%. In fact, a majority of the total yield lost in this study was due to just that first couple weeks of weed exposure.

Even if you go control the weeds after they've been there a couple weeks, our data suggests you can't recover that lost yield potential.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/pce.14171

And that's kind of where things stand right now, at least with our work in sugar beets. We have a couple more studies in the process of being submitted for publication, one with a little different method that basically confirms these studies done in buckets, and a second study that compares shade avoidance to water competition in a droughty environment. But those are for another day. Thanks for reading!
@AK This blew my mind when I first learned it. Plants "see" their competitors coming and they act strategically based on this information. And later I learned that some plants emit airborne chemicals when they're being eaten by insects, and their neighbours listen in and ramp up their chemical defenses in anticipation of the insects arriving.
Plants are so weird and different compared to animals, but in their own way they can still be "clever".
#botany #PlantEcology
@AK Great idea, I'll add #WeedWednesday to my veg crop weed management posts 🍅 Nice to see another land grant researcher on here.