SirEviscerate 
I...do not understand how electricity works.
Pari Moon-Forest@SirEviscerate It's not you. Some headline writer doesn't understand how English works. DOH!
Jake Mannix@PariMoonForest @SirEviscerate now hold on a second, the writer didn't say "... *because* a tree falls on an ice cream truck", merely "after" tree falls...
so, allowed, on a technicality?
@pbrane @SirEviscerate
That after sort of infers because of...I used to have to write those headlines, so I'd say no.
That after sort of infers because of...I used to have to write those headlines, so I'd say no.
@PariMoonForest @SirEviscerate yes, for normal humans, the implication is also "because of", but if we were lawyers we could argue that it *is* true that the power went out "after" the ice cream truck was crushed!
But fine, journalists aren't lawyers, so you win! :)