#toReadList https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01423-x
"Democratic theorists and the public emphasize the centrality of news media to a well-functioning society. Yet, there are reasons to believe that news exposure can have a range of largely overlooked detrimental effects (...). Across both experiments, we demonstrate that reducing or increasing news exposure has no impact on the positive or negative outcomes tested. (....)."
Summary thread: https://twitter.com/BernhardClemm/status/1596173780623437824?t=sdfeGngOD2lOoDvPwRCJAg&s=09
Null effects of news exposure: a test of the (un)desirable effects of a ‘news vacation’ and ‘news binging’ - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Democratic theorists and the public emphasize the centrality of news media to a well-functioning society. Yet, there are reasons to believe that news exposure can have a range of largely overlooked detrimental effects. This preregistered project examines news exposure effects on desirable outcomes, i.e., political knowledge, participation, and support for compromise, and detrimental outcomes, i.e., attitude and affective polarization, negative system perceptions, and worsened individual well-being. We rely on two complementary over-time experiments that combine participants’ survey self-reports and their behavioral browsing data: one that incentivized participants to take a ’news vacation’ for a week (N = 803; 6M visits) in the US, the other to ‘news binge’ for 2 weeks (N = 939; 4M visits) in Poland. Across both experiments, we demonstrate that reducing or increasing news exposure has no impact on the positive or negative outcomes tested. These null effects emerge irrespective of participants’ prior levels of news consumption and whether prior news diet was like-minded, and regardless of compliance levels. We argue that these findings reflect the reality of limited news exposure in the real world, with news exposure comprising on average roughly 3% of citizens’ online information diet.

Nature
@Lenafrescamente what a bold title for an experiment that lasted two weeks at most.
@fabiogiglietto true that (nature...). Did not read it in detail so far but the authors do mention the limitation of the short time. Still great that pre-registered null effects are published.
@Lenafrescamente the null effect of news exposure is a finding that in itself would trash an entire discipline. Very worth publishing. Big if true.
@fabiogiglietto wouldn't go that far. "Strong media effects" has been removed from theorizing in #Communication and #MediaPsych since ages ( => differential susceptibility to media effects model etc.). And the variables (Polarization, well-being, perceived political knowledge) are all more closely related to debates about sich strong persuasion -type effects than let's say: knowledge about a certain issue covered in the news (e.g., current politics). These "big changes" are more complicated...