Important!
Share this article with everyone. It is outstanding
You May Be Early, but You're Not Wrong: A Covid Reading List, by
@JessicaLexicus
Important!
Share this article with everyone. It is outstanding
You May Be Early, but You're Not Wrong: A Covid Reading List, by
@JessicaLexicus
"Yesterday, I came across a somber tweet by a man who’s trying to protect his family from Covid. He said, “my wife has been speaking with the principal of my children’s elementary school and that he has been advising her to file for divorce because I was clearly not well and ‘my life revolves around fear.’”
Yes, a principal is telling someone’s wife to divorce him because he wants to protect them from a deadly, disabling virus.
"Companies are also starting to pressure their employees to get therapy “to conquer their fear of Covid.”
There’s a line from the film The Big Short that echoes through my head these days. The investor Michael Burry says, “I may have been early, but I’m not wrong.” There’s a lot of us who feel like that right now. A majority of the world thinks we’re crazy. In reality, we’re not crazy at all.
We have the facts.
"The latest studies tell us that’s not possible.
There’s no permanent immunity from this virus. Each time we catch it, this virus attacks our hearts and minds. It weakens us. It tries to kill us. It imprints on us, so a future variant has a better shot next time.
That next time could be a few months later.
Here are the key points:
"Everyone should know about these studies. I’ve linked to the original articles. I’ve tried to summarize them in clear language. I’ve also linked to summaries written by journalists who still care about the truth.
"Biggest takeaway: the media lied to us.
The evidence is overwhelming now.
Last winter, the media made a concerted effort to convince Americans that Covid had become mild. They said catching Omicron would protect us from future variants, and that we could ditch our masks. Newspapers were filled with op-eds basically telling us to go out and shop, celebrate, and get infected. They blanketed the internet with stories about the “relief” people felt catching Covid.
"Anyone who disagreed got labeled a doomsayer.
The optimists were all wrong.
There was no evidence to support any of these myths, just arrogant assertions from the same handful of pundits. The actual studies tell the truth. You don’t want to catch Covid once. You certainly don’t want to catch it multiple times. We should be getting boosted. We should be wearing masks.
We should be protecting our children.
"There’s only one alternative, and that’s catching Covid over and over until it destroys our immune systems, along with our hearts and minds.
Nobody wants that.
https://jessicawildfire.substack.com/p/you-may-be-early-but-youre-not-wrong
@Devijustice @yaneerbaryam
I go back to the question of "Do you want to be right or do you want to be effective?"
You can tell humans the truth and if they don't accept the message, then you can tell yourself that you are right and they are wrong.
Or you can try telling the truth in a different way that is more likely to be heard.
My point when I first commented was that even tho I agreed with the message, it was so bleak that I could see why people wouldn't want to listen.
@shaktinah I want the truth to be heard effectively, but I do not want to compromise the truth in order to find acceptance for whatever message is left.
I am just the messenger: I deliver the message — ideally in a simple and ego-free package. If the horse refuses to drink, there's no point grabbing the reins. I will be the trough. What the listener does with the message is up to them.
@trendless @Devijustice @yaneerbaryam
I'm not talking about compromising the truth. And I'd argue that the way a message is delivered is never neutral like a trough.
This convo started with 10 posts about how deadly COVID is and how the govt/media are lying to us. Only after I commented how it's understandable people would want to ignore such a bleak message was it added that it's possible to stop the virus. But that information was not presented in the previous 10 posts. That's what I mean.
@trendless @Devijustice @yaneerbaryam
Appreciating your thoughtful response & going to the trouble of pointing to some positive messaging. The reason why I did not consider masks to be a "solution" is because, at least in the US, the idea of wearing masks in perpetuity is not acceptable.
Most of my friends lean left. I've been surprised to learn that most of them have resumed traveling, gathering, and not masking (which is depressing). I'm interested to know how testing can end the pandemic.
@trendless @shaktinah @yaneerbaryam And because Americans are being so uniquely ridiculous about masking, we’ll end up with a lot of people disabled from covid, and they will deny disability claims and lower the working age to make up for lost workers (AL already working on this). And there will be more airborne pandemics, and we’ll lose even more people.
Unless Americans decide to change. Every other country has been far more willing to mask as needed.
@Devijustice @shaktinah I'm not sure there's an end without some as-yet unexpected, undiscovered miracle if we can't/won't use either respirators or quarantine+TTI (maybe even both) -- and both must be done in full measure with the political, scientific, medical, and public health establishments onboard and participating. The hard truth is we can't just decide we don't like the solution, unless our intent is not to solve it.
@shaktinah so many of us are in that same boat: those around us have drawn their line in the sand and will go no further, regardless how much information we provide -- and it may cost them a great deal of unnecessary harm.
Is there a reason why you feel it is your responsibility to change their minds?