@rustyk5 Gear is so small and light now, kids these days, etc., etc. cc: @mathowie https://a.wholelottanothing.org/2022/11/23/im-sorry-big-agnes/
I’m sorry, Big Agnes

A Whole Lotta Nothing

@mathowie When I hiked the Appalachian Trail in 1996, sometimes I'd see folks on short trips with gear from the 60s 70s, which blew my mind because of how heavy and awkward it was. Here I am, in the 2020s, and if I took any of my 90s gear on the AT, long-distance hikers would laugh like hell.

I, too, would have looked at that box and thought "cool, this is the tent, but where is everything else?"

@waldoj @mathowie I think about this a lot from the flip side. Was the 90s stuff not perfectly usable? Isn't it still? What (if anything) did we give up along the way?
@tbaxter @mathowie I started the AT with a 72 pound pack. The lightest I got my pack was 30 pounds (not including food or water). As a result, I broke metatarsals *10 times* along the way. I, for one, welcome our new ultralight overlords.
@waldoj @tbaxter holy shiiiiiit. My 1990s backpack was a 1970s Kelty external frame, but a week's worth of gear and food usually was in the 40-50lb range in total. 72! That's nuts!
@mathowie @tbaxter 72# included food and water (this was the weigh-in at Springer Mountain) *and* a laptop, cellphone, and digital camera, because sponsorships for my blog were the only way I could pay for the trip as a 17-year-old. And I have bad news about how much that stuff weighed back then. :-/
@waldoj @mathowie @tbaxter in 97, I started around that number, got down to the low 30 lbs. during the summer (70s frame pack, food and water and a nominal sleeping bag) and was hiking in sandals once my ankles were 1000 miles in. Ran out of money in CT, ate from hikers boxes until VT, and finished in ‘99. Sponsorship would have helped, but maybe not at that weight penalty…