I've created a small, incomplete, list of instances with moderators of color.

The list and suggestions became to much to keep up on my own, so here is a Google document, https://docs.google.com/document/d/12pTmSMpq8lMYyYlHT25DgTmdMmE6ysUyRHGiq-E4XdQ/edit?usp=sharingp

Here's how to move accounts and take your followers with you https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moving/

#BlackMastodon #BlackTwitter #BlackFedi #FediTips #TwitterMigration #MastoAdmin

New Copy of Fediverse instances with moderators of color

This initially started out as a post but I am offline more than online, so cannot keep up this list. This is why anybody can edit the document. The original is hidden, but I'd encourage you all to make a wiki based on the below instances and information. Hosting your own wiki. For a fully mana...

Google Docs
@blindscribe, what make those moderators only proof of concept? I have seen many of the respective instances in production for quite a while now.
@cnx @blindscribe Not proof of concept, not point of contact, not proof of capacity or the Pirates of the Caribbean, the most common interpretation of PoC outside technology and industry:

Person/People of Color

Thanks, @clacke, I don’t see that abbreviation outside tech very often. It creeps me out a bit that such phrase categorizing people by race is actually commonly used so casually, but I guess since the Anglosphere is predominantly white it makes other races exotic 🤷🏎

FWIW I wouldn’t be exactly comfortable were I to be recommended on the interwebs because of my skin color, unless my physical appearance is relevant to the job or work. Highlighting cultural distinction on the other hand is more appropriate IMHO, and I hope umbrella terms for it will gain more traction.

Cc: @blindscribe

Creative work - Wikipedia

@cnx

the reality for many is being ignored, overlooked, underestimated precisely because of the colour of their skin

@clacke @blindscribe

Indeed @ckohtala, but the interwebs is not meatspace. Verifying someone‘s skin color here is the equivalence of finding out the color of an IRL acquaintance’s toilet bowl. It’s not necessarily classified information (as in, fine to be shared) and most likely to be white, but choosing who to hang out with based on such information is creepy nevertheless, if not fetishizing.

Now culture, one the other hand, is entirely different, despite the large intersection because the majority of anglophone cyberspace is from the West. A purple guy online is more likely to appear similarly to a green gal from the same hood than another purple guy half the globe away. Shouldn’t our language reflect such distinction?

File:Internet dog.jpg - Wikipedia