New blog post: "Thoughts on Mastodon" https://nolanlawson.com/2022/11/22/thoughts-on-mastodon/
This was a tough one to write. Sorry if it's a bit of a downer.
New blog post: "Thoughts on Mastodon" https://nolanlawson.com/2022/11/22/thoughts-on-mastodon/
This was a tough one to write. Sorry if it's a bit of a downer.
To be clear:
- I don't plan on shutting down toot.cafe. Ever.
- I don't plan on shutting down Pinafore. I'm happy to accept pull requests, and I may even tinker a bit as long as I find it fun.
I am just being honest and upfront about my feelings toward the fediverse these days.
To give more context: for me, Mastodon lost its luster when my wife stopped using it.
She was on "weird Mastodon." Her entire goal was to make funny jokes and boost and riff on other people's funny jokes. Mastodon for her was sheer joy.
She got driven off the platform by the replies. (She is a woman on the internet, after all.) Weird sexual innuendo, "well actually"s, and people not getting the joke. Plus the funny people left. It became un-fun for her.
I used to joke that I was guided by "wife-driven development" (WDD). She would complain about a UI issue in Pinafore, and I'd fix it.
I could tell she was using Mastodon because she was alternating between laughing and typing. I was helping to enable her joy! What a motivator!
When she left the platform, and asked me to delete her Mastodon instance (freedom.horse), the raison d'être of Pinafore died. That's why I largely stopped working on it.
I find it fascinating that the philosopher C. Thi Nguyen has described Twitter as a game, and "weird Twitter" as the purest expression of that game: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347062879_How_Twitter_Gamifies_Communication
People on "weird Twitter" (and "weird Mastodon") were not interested in notoriety, or success, or influence. They just wanted to have fun. How many people can say that social media is just pure "fun" for them?
I think it would be great for that kind of culture to thrive on the fediverse.
@nolan I wonder will instances ever choose not to federate or to only whitelist a few instances keeping their community small.
Could be useful for some communities, or to keep things small and weird.
@Matt_Noyes @mike_hales Yes we took into consideration the RIPESS work but felt that it was crucial to get more specific and to distinguish between "social" and "solidarity" economy. This isn't to be pedantic, but because on the ground in the US our more radical work is being coopted and we lacked precision in our solidarity economy framing, let alone in our attempts at alignment. The website has a "list" but what actually animates this project is a community of practice that's forming.
@nolan I'm so sorry to hear that -- this is why I've wished (for *years*!) that Mastodon had an _allow-list_ method of federating, instead of a _block-list_. An allow list would allow people to slowly become part of the Fediverse, only federating with those they feel are friendly.
A block-list method, by comparison, is worse -- it allows people to be flooded right away by stuff they may not want.
I have no idea why this isn't a feature already!