This is a big problem for Mastodon.

Canadian journalist Erica Ifill just had her mastodon.online account suspended without explanation. She's been sharing stuff critical of Mastodon re: intersectional issues.

I get the decentralized structure and idea that each server has its own rules. But this Reddit-style moderation, where moderators with god-complexes make mysterious and arbitrary decisions, is going to cause people migrating to Mastodon to flee in droves.

https://www.presscheck.org/journalists/erica-ifill

PressCheck.org

I also don't think it is a serious solution to tell people, especially those from vulnerable communities, to just go find a server that respects them / allows them to criticize racism, etc.

People are joining Mastodon in good faith, but if they encounter these problems once, twice or more, it starts to send them the message they're not welcome here. It becomes a real brand problem and platform integrity issue.

There are a lot of people with good intentions putting work and time into building this platform who are probably frazzled and burnt out by how quickly its growing (first among them, Mastodon's founder @Gargron no doubt).

That said, I think it needs to continually ask itself if its structure and rules are advancing its mission and values or getting in the way of them? TBH, this kind of stuff seems at odds with what I like about Mastodon.

Update: Good to see @Mastodon being responsive and I'm sure it was an innocent mistake, but these mistakes keep happening and they point to deeper issues with the approach to moderation over here that really need to be worked out. A lot of responsibility is left on the shoulders of volunteer mods. Things could be more transparent and less arbitrary.

I hope people take some of these concerns that have been surfacing seriously rather than just tell people to go find a different server or whatever

And here is @Gargron addressing the moderation issue outlined above.

Some bigger questions about how these systems are set-up, but at least someone is stepping forward and showing accountability:

https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/109383947978442853

@llebrun @Gargron I think there are a few questions about the viability and sustainability of volunteer moderators that the Mastodon community need to question, evaluate, learn, and adapt to— and by all accounts they appear to be the type to do that well.

Two items I’d like to (re) raise:

1/x

@llebrun @Gargron
1) the health and safety of the mods and admins. Are they aware, trained, compensated, and protected from harassment, doxxing, threats?
Are they prepared to handle what might be extremely traumatic images and content while sifting through content? Are there supports for their mental health doing this line of work?

Low-paid Facebook moderators have dealt with longterm health issues due to the trauma of seeing content as part of their work.
2/x

@llebrun @Gargron
is it possible they will need to be employed to ensure quality, experience, judgement over a longer period of time? Not to mention benefits, breaks, etc?

3/x

@llebrun @Gargron
Lastly, has the community underestimated the need for more revenue to support adequate resources for moderation? If so will they need to reconsider the staunch donationware-only model in support of other possible revenue streams for instances?

4/x

@llebrun @Gargron

Mastodon looks *a lot* like email. Which is basically at this point a ubiquitous utility. It offers a range of options to users to pay for the service through ads, pay-for use, community run, etc.

Users then choose the course of action based on their values, without (for the most part), any loss of interoperability.

You OK with weird ad surveillance? Go gmail. Want to pay to ensure your privacy? Protonmail. Etc.
5/5