@Urban_Tribesman @Geri they get paid to play matches for their club.
I'm asking them to stand by their supposed morals.
@Urban_Tribesman @leftie_kt If their cause crumbles at the first level of threat then they weren't very committed to that cause, and one could say it was tokenism?
However, I don't refute your argument that FIFA are the ones who are primarily in the wrong though.
@AliceDay @Urban_Tribesman @leftie_kt
"We risked death and imprisonment for what we believed in, others were concerned about a yellow card"
"Europe teams won’t use LGBTQ armbands at World Cup after FIFA threats"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2022/11/21/world-cup-one-love-armbands-yellow-cards/
Jessica Marglin, professor of religion, argues that Sharia law is a complex tradition – one that accommodates same-sex attraction alongside rulings condemning homosexual intercourse. <strong> [5 min read] </strong>
A foul is an unfair act by a player, deemed by the referee to contravene the game's laws, that interferes with the active play of the game."
To my way of thinking, it seems hard to say that a small strip of clothing "interferes with the active play of the game."