On Twitter, I tried to avoid RTing anything that talks about bad things happening in the world, because I saw that it was becoming a depressing place to be. I felt that it had crossed a line from highlighting worthy causes to simply indulging in despair over evils in the world.

Do CWs fix that? Do you find that, if you are not in a good place and you see a CW that tells you the post will make your mood worse, you can easily move past it? Do you expand them all anyway without thinking? Do you feel guilt for ignoring real problems if you scroll past?

Basically, are CWs enough (perhaps combined with Mastodon's anti-viral nature) to prevent our feeds from becoming draining the way that twitter often was? If not, are there better ways to prevent it than what I settled on there?

@madewokherd It feels like you're talking about someone like me! 😅
I tend to read everything from the people I follow and everything they boost, (hello fear of appearing ignorant).
I literally had to unfollow some people in the last years to curate my timeline into something more wholesome/balanced, that helped me stay sane and functioning.
That being said, I think CWs are definitely a great thing to do, because they basically help each other moderate our own timelines (esp. local and federated). It also helps the admins/moderators and take off some of the amount of work.
I'm still not used to it and prefer deciding myself, what I want to see or not. But I'm willing to explore these sides to find and cultivate best practices.

@Weirdaholic Thank you for responding.

I think I have the same problem. It occurred to me when reading your reply that I could mute things that are a problem for me, if I don't have the self-control to ignore them.

It'd be nice if we can keep namesearching from becoming a thing here so we can use actual names and people can filter them properly. I'm.. not very hopeful about that.