Tech CEOs coming from Twitter are like "There's no way a federated system can scale! Look at this thing, it runs on Rails!"

And there are so many loaded assumptions in that statement, between how this thing is supposed to work and what the capacities and limits of the underlying technologies are. Like, I seriously doubt your expertise on any of those subjects?

Anyway, it's not like every single instance has to replicate all content made by millions of accounts, or that the majority of traffic has to be concentrated in any one place. There will be challenges, but the nature of the beast is not the same as a corporate social network.
@sean Isn’t email a federated system?
@rasterweb Yes, but it's also dominated by large corporations with proprietary implementations and reputation systems that negatively affect self-hosters.
@sean Totally. I just shut down my mail server this year (after running it for about 15 years.) I was more after the fact that email is *waves hands* everywhere and no one "owns" it. Remember when Slack tried to kill email for their proprietary version of IRC?
@rasterweb as a chat client, Slack is pretty okay. As a company and platform? Dogshit.

Although, I've always been deeply weirded out by how much Slack and Discord look alike, down to certain visual stylings, UI components, and method of using Electron for desktop and mobile clients.