How the British constitution works (from the FT's article on Johnson's last stand):
đŚđ: https://twitter.com/chrisbrooke/status/1593903985961885696
How the British constitution works (from the FT's article on Johnson's last stand):
đŚđ: https://twitter.com/chrisbrooke/status/1593903985961885696
@richardmoorhead @ScouseRefugee One could argue whether something can be considered part of the Constitution if it hasnât been approved by both chambers of Parliament.
For instance, the Ministerial Code is sometimes considered part of the Constitution yet Boris Johnson unilaterally changed it when he didnât like its implications for himself.
If the PM can change it without Parliament, is it really part of the Constitution or just someoneâs opinion?
@lennardvanotterloo @richardmoorhead @ScouseRefugee
We need to challenge all the nonsense about an 'unwritten constitution ', Every. Single. Time!
I think the truth is, the UK has no constitution at all worthy of the name. (i.e. no supermajority in Parliament is required for change).
Legislation and tradition doth not a constitutional settlement make!
@richardmoorhead Here is the original article.
In the Bunker: Boris Johnsonâs last stand
https://www.ft.com/content/e6d6c253-45a1-4c53-9621-405e2e1507e6
Hard to read the full article without thinking of The Thick of It.
Childish, incompetent, petty, boorish, and above all, entirely self-serving. All of them.