RT @[email protected]

How the British constitution works (from the FT's article on Johnson's last stand):

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/chrisbrooke/status/1593903985961885696

Chris Brooke on Twitter

“How the British constitution works (from the FT's article on Johnson's last stand):”

Twitter
@richardmoorhead I am totally sick of hearing about this mythical constitution. It does not exist, we have no constitutional rights

@richardmoorhead @ScouseRefugee One could argue whether something can be considered part of the Constitution if it hasn’t been approved by both chambers of Parliament.

For instance, the Ministerial Code is sometimes considered part of the Constitution yet Boris Johnson unilaterally changed it when he didn’t like its implications for himself.

If the PM can change it without Parliament, is it really part of the Constitution or just someone’s opinion?

@lennardvanotterloo @richardmoorhead @ScouseRefugee
We need to challenge all the nonsense about an 'unwritten constitution ', Every. Single. Time!

I think the truth is, the UK has no constitution at all worthy of the name. (i.e. no supermajority in Parliament is required for change).

Legislation and tradition doth not a constitutional settlement make!

@richardmoorhead 'works' is perhaps a step more 'bumbling through' (which is very much Johnson's modus operandi).
@padraigpostal yes, I don’t imagine the author of the tweet means well functioning when he says works here!

@richardmoorhead Here is the original article.

In the Bunker: Boris Johnson’s last stand
https://www.ft.com/content/e6d6c253-45a1-4c53-9621-405e2e1507e6

In the Bunker: Boris Johnson’s last stand

News, analysis and comment from the Financial Times, the worldĘźs leading global business publication

Financial Times
@richardmoorhead
I think I know what this means, but can some brilliant constitutional experts explain exactly what it means to a lay person?
I, and others, would really appreciate it.

@richardmoorhead

Hard to read the full article without thinking of The Thick of It.

Childish, incompetent, petty, boorish, and above all, entirely self-serving. All of them.