For those wondering, Mastodon contains no “web3” or crypto technology, and significantly predates any of that. The technology deployed here is primarily ActivityPub, which has roots in tech like RSS and PubSubHubbub.

It is noteworthy that “web3” designs are absent from the Twitter emigration discussion; that’s because it’s a scam and not fit for purpose.

The minute people start talking about adding crypto to the fediverse, run. That’s not what this is about and violates its spirit and design.

And to be clear, for anyone to whom it is not patently obvious, I’m talking about “crypto” as in cryptocurrency, not standard cryptological encryption which is widely used to secure HTTPs connections. That’s standard web technology, and best practice.
@davetroy
So encrypted in transit but..... not at rest on instances, correct?
@crichardson I haven’t given a full review of it but yes I believe that’s correct. Simply not a design goal.
@davetroy @crichardson encrypting at rest isn't any more "web3 crypto" than https is - they're both sensible security defaults
@mho @davetroy @crichardson enabling disk encryption on the servers would solve half that problem (adding database level encryption is possible too but slightly harder). But in either case the admin will have access to the keys.