Interesting piece by @mathewi about the culture clash between journalists accustomed to Twitter & existing Mastodon instances. He reports about 45 servers are blocking people on journa.host, which I was seriously considering joining or shifting towards: https://www.cjr.org/analysis/journalists-want-to-recreate-twitter-on-mastodon-mastodon-is-not-into-it.php What do you think? How should members of the media be approaching participating or reporting on the #fediverse?
Journalists want to re-create Twitter on Mastodon. Mastodon is not into it.

<p>Ever since Elon Musk completed his $45 billion takeover of Twitter last month, there has been a steady stream of users, including a number of journalists, signing up for Mastodon, an open-source alternative. No one controls Mastodon—or rather, everyone controls their own version of it. There are thousands of servers running the software, and each […]</p>

Columbia Journalism Review

@digiphile @mathewi

Theory1: Journalism companies (TV, newspapers) mostly missed the #cluetrain that online could preserve (1994) or revive (2022?) their presence as a host of #local #community, by being part of the conversation -- not just using a new medium as a pipe to deliver its same old stuff.

Theory2: Communication-&-community-savvy online-natives see "journalists" as vampires lurking on servers to suck in info & search for things to "report" sensationally & for ad-supported profit.

@BobStep @mathewi reasonable hypotheses

@digiphile @BobStep @mathewi

Yup. Debodevem, as they say in Chicago.