So someone just asked me, "When did social media get off track and become less about human connectivity?"

Great question, and it deserves its own thread!

I'd say it was when metrics became emphasized above all else.

Once metrics becomes all-encompassing, humanity becomes an abstraction.

Because what does a metric like, "1,000 followers" mean anyway? And why is that valuable?

I don't know why it's valuable, but I know what it de-values: 1,000 humans.

At some point, the social media industry started measuring everything.

Metrics became a god.

Even the *amount* of metrics you were measuring became a selling feature.

And nobody was willing to challenge the metrics! Its value was self-explanatory (supposedly).

That attitude started filtering down to every crevice of product.

It got so bad, there were companies like Klout helping end users measure their core metrics!

And of course, who could forget influencers buying followers?

Building good social media requires a kind of conceit: that human connection can't be measured nor does it require metrics.

Perhaps this is why Facebook and Twitter were doomed to die.

@atomicpoet Social media became a way to advertise yourself and/or your business, then the influencer title was born.

I believe this, even though one of many, is a huge reason why the metrics became so important to people.

The social aspect of it is mostly gone, replaced by ads and people publishing their own life as a reality show
@atomicpoet Yes! I am a publicist, which includes social media expertise, and I have always gone against the grain on this with my clients. Be yourself. If you are not social, then maybe social media isn't for you. If you are, great! Get out there and be social. I mean, if you are repping a brand you may need to at least refrain from certain things, but other than that, it is a community and a community is not only made up of businesses. It is made up first of people.
@atomicpoet I've been saying this forever. On Twitter my analysis of this didn't exactly win over people. This tracking of metrics can be very deceptive and illusory, doesn't mean what people think it means, and replicates the worst values of a dog-eat-dog society.
@atomicpoet if there is something I hate with a vengeance it’s influencers. They only influence there own bankaccount.
@atomicpoet Hahaha, I remember Klout. Pure comedy.
@atomicpoet David Beer's book metric power is excellent at examining the interplay between metrics, neoliberalism and power. Basically metrics enable competition by clearly identifying 'winners' and 'losers' in an 'objective' way. And since the 80s we've seen the metricisation of schools, healthcare etc. Social media basically fits with this broader logic (much of which was influenced by earlier/other forms of computing)
@sy @atomicpoet #metatext let’s you turn off like and boost counts and it’s so refreshing
@sy @atomicpoet would love that feature to be added to the #MastodoniOSApp

@sy @atomicpoet
Looking forward to reading that book, put it on the top of my list, as a neo-Liberal in recovery (15 years or so now)

The double edged sword of measurement and thus adding implicit and explicit goals to systems, thus driving behaviour... fascinates me.

Especially, how many of the things we want to (or need to for true success) encourage are hard to measure.

@atomicpoet Measuring, by itself, is fine. But "when the measure becomes a target it ceases to be a good measure".

@atomicpoet The most blatant example of this I've encountered are the influencers following The Social Architects' "Trending Hashtags" account. Bots and the influencers they follow side by side. I'd have thought The Harry Walker Agency and SAP would have know better.

The Social Architects claim 19 billion impressions for their 1000 clients. When you look at their posts there are rarely any comments. Just the network retweeting itself.

https://twitter.com/TrendMyHashtag/followers

Trend My Hashtag. Very subtle. 🙄

Log in to X / X

Log in to X to see the latest. Join the conversation, follow accounts, see your Home Timeline, and catch up on posts from the people you know.

X (formerly Twitter)
@atomicpoet agreed. It happened around 2012-2014 when I stopped using   site daily. I was a *heavy* user from 2008-2012 :)

@jared @atomicpoet
Me too. I agree it went through big changes somewhere in the early teens that dampened conversation.

One big negative change was opening up the visibility of everyone's replies, making conversations riskier. The rise of the "rando" conversation interlopers.

The failure to kick harassers off caused hashtags to become vile platforms for spam, porn, and hate.

The failure to implement reporting of brigades caused popular people to stop reading their replies.

@atomicpoet MKBHD says internet runs on ads so the metrics work for business…
@soda Okay, what's MKBHD?
@atomicpoet @soda It's a popular youtuber who recently uploaded a video about the whole twitter situation.

He talked about how even though it's annoying the internet runs on ads. Every business needs to advertise themselves and so on.
@feinzer @soda The problem is that on social media, people don't buy products, they buy causes.

@atomicpoet agreed!

"Evil begins when you begin to treat people as things" - #TerryPratchett

@benmcfc @atomicpoet 100% agree. The comodifisation of people right across the Internet killed it a loooong time ago, which is why you find me hanging out in places like this...

@atomicpoet
Great response. I'd add that those metrics translate to dollars for advertisement buys, then product engagement, etc.

Human communities have been cash-colonized. We're all consumers, so why block hate speech? The ultra rich feel untouchable?

Don't know if this is overly cynical, but I sometimes I think the companies behind optimization technologies cloak this reality by characterizing targeted ads as empathy.

Just thinking out loud, and hope I'm not bumming anyone out!

@atomicpoet in so many areas of life (especially in work) value is lost due to an almost myopic focus on data and metrics - large numbers of M&A transactions do not achieve what was set out to be won because they forget that success comes through people wanting and hence making something happen. IMHO deals driven by Finance and numbers without consideration of the human elements are doomed to fail.
@atomicpoet I thought it was when MySpace was superseded 🤷

@atomicpoet Surely it was simply when advertising revenue became the more important part.

If its free your the product, in this case your the target audience. Communicating with friends, colleagues and others becomes secondary to the needs of the advertisers.

All of this is evident on twitter right now with Musk trying desperately to sell his changes to advertisers ignoring all the noise coming from the user base and that is seeing them flock to other platforms.

@sailingbikeruk Obviously, advertising is a factor. However, I'm telling you that the cult of metrics arrived even before advertising was rolled out.
@atomicpoet - I couldn't argue against that and the more I think about it, its reasonable that you need the metrics to attract the advertisers.

@atomicpoet This reminds me of Ivan Illich: If a human initiative crosses a certain threshold, it will first destroy what it was intended to do, and then it will become a threat to society.

As an example, cars were designed to reduce distances, but now they multiply them because they are the only valid mode of transportation; cities are designed to accommodate them. Currently, cars are preventing people from walking.

@atomicpoet Twitter was designed to communicate, but now not only it does missinforms, it divides and creates conflict.
@atomicpoet honestly, once venture capitalists get involved, everything good to hell.
@atomicpoet Completely agree. Many 'metrics' seem so often to be measuring something unintended or unimportant. Neither causal or connected in meaningful ways. I think a great deal of things we measure are making assumptions that are now less helpful. How much money something is, rarely tells you how much it costs. Hourly rates don't tell you how much someone earns or how happy they are doing it. We are not merely economic units, or rather we are until we think & behave like whole people again.
@atomicpoet and once metrics become everything, Goodheart's Law becomes the noose we hang ourselves with

@atomicpoet those kind of e-peen metrics have been a thing since before the internet. There were "post counters" back on the first days of compuserve. Remember Eternal September?

My answer would be once something awful became a thing. For better and worse, it had a ripple effect that is still felt on the internet in a very bad way. Without Something Awful, we don't get stuff like 4chan and gamer gate and such down the road.

@atomicpoet gonna amend this and say also once Maddox went viral around 1998. One of the very first times I ever heard someone talk about the internet on mass media (the radio) was plugging his site for the bad childrens art post he made that went viral. All of the sudden, being an insufferable, angry asshole was THE thing on the internet. That coincided with stuff like photoshop friday becoming big around same time. Suddenly, the internet was a giant slam book. I hate it still.
@atomicpoet Can I just say how much I hate how the default "persona" on the internet these days is for someone to be snarky? How communication begins with "sick burns" and "roasts," usually from people who are powerfully unfunny and repeating the same worn material? I absolutely hate "burn" culture and how it's a constant race to present the best tight five on any unfortunate topic.
@atomicpoet I think you have nailed it. I would extend your analysis to other aspects of (at least U.S.) society as well. For example: when did the news media get off track and become less about reporting the events that objectively happened?
@atomicpoet a loooong time ago when AI tuk o’er
@atomicpoet The issue is always about greed. Cool tech started adding ads just to be self sufficient (e.g. google, twitter, fb, etc..) but then they discover they were making so much money out of it that they couldn't stop, they went public and were condemn to ever growing increased profits. and that is what doomed Social Networks. Currently it is happening to reddit too.