I'm getting the idea that political speech is just too upsetting for the people on this site. My whole purpose on social media is to engage with political speech.
Think of it this way. A content warning label serves two purposes. It protects people who don’t want their feed cluttered or upsetting and a service as a little preview of something exciting that might be hidden behind the curtain. Kind of like the quote tweet did
Also keep in mind that out of courtesy many will not boost any political tweet that doesn’t have a warning. So actually, respecting others will help get your message across and create the kind of community we want.
@mosugerman @Stmorecowbell @jentaub That sounds like a box I would like to check! I’m on the web. Do I count as having a personal app with settings?
(And to muse upon, mildly: it very definitely the Best of All Possible Worlds that the default is not the other way around, or that it is not a setup choice instead of a default?)
@mosugerman @Stmorecowbell @jentaub I think this only refers to the Content Warning. I would love to be less sheltered from users on other servers, and also to have an easier time going through the act of following them.
It seems inevitable that someone will make a Mastodon app that puts all of that in the background, and that everyone who is not superhardcore will use that app.
@touchingfreedom I don’t think my assertion that Mastodon is being flooded with ex-Twitter users eager to discuss the U.S. midterms is insensitive or insufficiently broad-minded. I’m pretty sure it’s straightforwardly factual.
And, of course, like me, many of those users have a lot of other interests, too. I listen solely to non-U.S. news podcasts, for instance—and, dang it all, U.S. politics do seem pretty worth discussing right now :)