I wrote a thread about Mastodon on Twitter, it needs to be read.
https://twitter.com/pati_gallardo/status/1590485665535643649?s=46&t=hpE2Unzsn-9qKirLfo3tYA
Patricia Aas 🐢🏳️‍🌈 on Twitter

“Ok fine. I have tried to hold my tongue, but there is a line, and when Mastodon folks threaten BIPOC people with getting blocked for not Content Warning when they talk about racism… I need to get real with y’all. 🧵”

Twitter

@patricia thanks for writing this.

Folks here on #Mastodon should read this, and take this seriously.
Clearly, there's a culture around how things are done here at Mastodon, but maybe there is a better way to teach folks about that culture instead of blocking/banning folks outright.

If #Mastadon is to be a place for well-meaning folks on the internet, threatening people may not be the best way forward.

And it is hard to know who means well, but @[email protected]'s call out is pretty clear cut #IMHO

an instance where "well-meaning" is not clear-cut:

I have refrained from posting anything about last night's elections here in the US, because I know I would be dinged about CWs. That makes me not want to post about elections/politics.

That does not feel very free-speech-y.

But I can also easily imagine discourse around US politics and elections getting out of hand (as intentioned by the OP), so a CW may not be a bad idea for all things politics (?). I dunno!

@krishnavp I'd like to stay here and improve this culture, so I'm busting my head on how to solve this.

I live in EU and couldn't care less about US elections, but it's up to me to curate what I see. You should feel free to speak out about what matters to you.

Feels to me we should use hashtags more and clean our feeds as we see fit, rather than threaten others into doing it for us.

@dkruythoff the thing that has been working well for me: picking what I follow. I follow hashtags, and folks from the intro posts. So far this has been good enough.

Not sure where this starts to breakdown, or why there would be a need for others to *necessarily* use CWs to suit my interests in my feed. If I do not like something, I guess I should be able to just unfollow (?).
Not sure where that would break down, and fail to scale.

@krishnavp sounds like a sane strategy to me. I believe warnings should be used for that purpose: To warn for extreme or undesirable content.

I can't imagine they were meant to prevent people from every single thing they dislike.
We're sharing space here. We need to at least show some tolerance and be able to look away.

@dkruythoff @krishnavp this is the problem though, how does a collective define "undesirable" content?

People on here have different power structures to their environment. Asking people without power to be more civil to people with power is inherently intolerant

https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2019/03/14/700897826/when-civility-is-used-as-a-cudgel-against-people-of-color

When Civility Is Used As A Cudgel Against People Of Color

For people of color, "civility" is often a means of containing them, preventing social mobility and preserving the status quo.

NPR
@dkruythoff @krishnavp (note: I see from your recent boosts you probably essentially agree here on this point)

@Jakeout @krishnavp yes I believe I do.

As a socially awkward white male, I thread carefully around these issues.
I know I can be blind to my undeserved privileges, and just want people to be free to speak up.

Thus, I take issue with the cultural problems I'm seeing here.

Maybe we can use the freedom to create collectives to our advantage somehow.

I'm struggling right now as I'd just like to see this fixed.

@dkruythoff @Jakeout I agree with you Jake! And thank you for the ref on NPR (just finished reading it).

to the issue of defining "undesirable" content: I think it can help with clarifying what it means for a specific collective, or in Mastodon's case: a specific server/instance.

I would like to see pre-defined examples/presets of CWs that I can pick from when I am posting something. And mods should be able to change those CW presets ... making them different for different instances. (1/2)

@dkruythoff @Jakeout

... this open ended nature of the CW feature, where a poster can put *any CW that they deem fit* is giving a powerful feature with little guidance/guardrails.

e.g., if I m on a photography instance, I think I would understand if some of the CW pre-sets were "Not original content", or "memes" (random examples). Because those CWs might make sense to that community and calling out examples like that would give anyone a sense for what is acceptable in that community. (2/2)