Scott Hanselman ✅👸🏽🐝🌮I'm coming up LIVE on #dotnetconf and #github universe in the next 10 min https://www.dotnetconf.net/?utm_source=dotnet&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=watchnow&WT.mc_id=-mastodon-scottha
mucio
phil@phillipmai @shanselman I feel like some ML algorithm needs retraining or it didn't like dotnet twice
@mucio @phillipmai LOL you do know that I write the content warning, right? There's no algo here
Nuno do Carmo (ko-fi/nunix)
Warren@shanselman @mucio @phillipmai On one hand, I feel like custom content warnings are prime grounds for trolling people, but on the other hand everyone has been super great about not spoiling Andor yet. That said, I presume abusing content warnings is frowned upon.
@phillipmai @mucio @Warren I think insincere ones could be a problem. I think given the vibe here, mine was appropriately accurate
n3wjack
Paul Nicholas 
B.C.
Jason Imison
The Mentor@mentor @shanselman @phillipmai sure, like to mark some content NSFW or Spoiler Alert. I didn't know it was left to the users and, for sure, I didn't expect the self-deprecating twist :)
@shanselman @mucio 🤣🤣🤣 - thanks for the warning ⚠️ hah
@shanselman @phillipmai ops... No, I didn't know it. I just arrived here and I remembered someone complaining about some automatic form of "moderation" here. Knowing what I know now, I appreciate the humor. Thanks :)
@mucio @phillipmai aw, my apologies. Yes here I wouldn’t think about it as much a content warning, and more like a subject line. It’s a little bit of metadata to let you know what you’re getting into, for example, you could avoid all US politics this way, but you can always auto expand them in your own settings
@shanselman @phillipmai but in that case I would miss the warning :) If it's a custom text chosen by the author, it makes sense to see it.
I guess I will need to test it
@phillipmai @mucio you can auto expand, and it will still show the warning as a subject title