Elon Musk may put the entirety of Twitter behind a paywall.

Elon Musk has blabbed on and on about free speech, but if he does this, it's certainly not "free as in beer" speech. https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-twitter-paywall-genius-idiot-nazis-tom-fitton-1849756014

Elon Musk Considers Putting All of Twitter Behind Paywall in Latest Genius Idea

The idea comes in the wake of Musk's other brilliant idea: Fire half the staff.

Gizmodo

If you're still a Twitter user, a paywall should offend you since Elon Musk is attempting to monetize content *you* have made—and not compensate you for it.

At least the New York Times' makes ethical sense. They pay their writers.

Personally, I spend $50/month to use the Fediverse.

I'm not against monetization of social media services.

But there's something profoundly icky about a Twitter paywall.

I have no doubt that putting the entirety of Twitter behind a paywall will grow the Fediverse.

But I don't celebrate this. People's entire professional livelihoods depend on Twitter being public.

By the way, activists have been warning for years about Big Social *owning* your content and charging for it.

Most of us didn't listen because we traded the rights over our work for convenience.

If you don't think tweets are work, well they are. Valuable enough that a billionaire paid money to own them.

And now he wants to charge money for access to your work!

Twitter's potential paywall is why I'm so mindful of where I live on social media.

1. Mastodon is a non-profit, and I provide donations for it.
2. I self-host three instances
3. I de-federate from any instance I consider unethical

The Fediverse is so valuable because it at least offers better control over your data than Big Social.

Your data is easier to archive here.

You can more easily migrate from one instance to another.

You can self-host, and post from *your site*.

Personal data is the new oil.

Back in 2020, I calculated the worth of companies that harvest your personal data. It was in the ballpark of $4 trillion dollars.

Why is it so valuable? Because many services can't function without the collection of your personal data.

Surveillance capitalism is literally what makes much of the economy work.

But here's the outrageous thing. You—the person whose data is being harvested—don't see a cut of the windfall.

Why do I bring up *your* personal data in the context of a potential Twitter paywall?

Because Elon Musk has made blatant what has, until now, been hush-hush: that everything you contribute to Big Social is valuable.

It's not just your tweets, but also:

1. The time you spend on site
2. Your search queries
3. Your social sentiment
4. Your interests
5. Your contacts and relationships

You put in the work, gave Twitter that data—and now they're going to monetize all of it to the very last drop.

My God, I hope the Fediverse starts a mass trend where people finally say, "My personal data is mine—not for Big Social to own!"
@atomicpoet technically your personal data (up to an extent) is for whatever instance you are on, to own. Or at least the posts you make and the content in them are.
@beyond9thousand This is true. This is why I self-host a single-user instance at atomicpoet.org.
@atomicpoet that's smart, but I see you're on the .social instance as we speak. What's the catch?
@beyond9thousand The catch is that I've had this specific account since 2018, and donate to mastodon.social's continued operation.