A few Twitter migrants have told me, "I don't care about all this Fediverse technology, I just want to remake Twitter."
You can't remake Twitter. It's impossible. An understanding of the technology will demonstrate why it's impossible.
A few Twitter migrants have told me, "I don't care about all this Fediverse technology, I just want to remake Twitter."
You can't remake Twitter. It's impossible. An understanding of the technology will demonstrate why it's impossible.
The reason why the Fediverse cannot be Twitter is because they're trying to solve different problems.
Twitter: To collect and publish data through a centralized service, for one corporation to exclusively monetize it
Fediverse: To disseminate data through a decentralized protocol(s), allowing *anyone* to build with it
Why won't the Fediverse suggest people for you to follow? That's not the Fediverse's job.
Why can't you see a curated home feed built around your customized interests? That's not the Fediverse's job.
Why isn't there a universal archive of status updates available through search? That's not the Fediverse's job.
To give a weird analogy:
Twitter is a newspaper delivery boy. All he sends you is a carefully curated selection of news, editorials, and ads.
The Fediverse is your postwoman. She sends many letters and packages -- of varying content and sizes. She doesn't editorialize your mail. She doesn't even know what's being delivered to you. If she picked and chose which and what to send and receive, she'd be fired.
One more reason why it's good to know why understanding how the Fediverse's technology is important.
This is so important.
I talk about it so much that I'm almost sick of hearing myself harp on about it.
The Fediverse can't be owned by a billionaire -- it's literally impossible.
In theory, Elon Musk could buy mastodon.social. He could employ all the developers who work on the Fediverse. He might even trademark Fediverse Corporation™.
But he can't own the Fediverse because the technology makes it impossible.
Don't want social media to be acquired by the likes of Elon Musk?
Use the Fediverse, a collection of technologies for which that's impossible to happen.
@steveriggins Nomadic identity is still an emergent technology on the Fediverse.
One app that does this better than others is Hubzilla. They've basically made it so that when you move from one instance to another, virtually all your content is preserved.
The way they do this is through a protocol called Zot6.
Unfortunately, Hubzilla isn't so user friendly and it's kind of ugly -- and thus hasn't taken off.
@chrisa I actually deleted my Twitter account 😂
That said, I'm bringing this all up due detraction that been expressed here. I don't think everyone who's using Mastodon is necessarily going to stay here.
@atomicpoet
This notion of something being unbuyable-because-not-ownable is very hard for some people to grasp.
People trying to understand postcapitalist phenomena within a capitalist model are like people with only one word for "plant " trying to comprehend a botanical garden.
I mean it CAN be shoehorned into their terms, but it's not a good fit.
@atomicpoet If Musk would like to buy every Mastodon instance, I welcome his efforts.
My willingness to create instances for him to buy is greater than his credit line.
@atomicpoet your post led me to this nice explainer article.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-earth-fediverse
This is all new to me and quite fascinating. Thanks for bringing this to my attention!
@atomicpoet I mean, you say that, but as a twitter migrant my masto feed is already looking a lot like my twitter feed, which is comforting in a way, but personally, I really want to move away from the addictive toxicity of twitter.
That said, I think some twitter migrants are often following familiar migrant accounts because the local and federated feeds are super-fast or jammed to the last 3 mins (probably because of all the new accounts?)