It appears that this instance is taking off! With that in mind, do folks have any suggestions as to governance or administration?

We are happy to run Sigmoid Social just as we have been running The Gradient for 4 years now, as a space for the AI community to communicate, share insights, and more.

But we are also open to not having total control!

@thegradient @anamarasovic I’m interested in making sure that this instance can support the visibility of early-career scientists. I think people should be encouraged to share their papers with short threads—call them Tootorials—I was intending to make that suggestion Monday and try to kick it off.
@Riedl @thegradient @anamarasovic that was a great feature of Twitter- to discover cool work in areas not exactly overlapping one's own- and I'm looking forward to that!

@Riedl It might be nice to spread awareness that by default, i.e. public visibility, every single post in a thread will show up separately on timelines.

Some guides recommend to only make the first post public, and all follow-ups unlisted, so people only see the full thread if they click on the first post.

Folks coming from Twitter are likely not used to the concept of post visibility (& I'm not sure yet if that's more of a burden than a feature for writing threads, but think ppl should know).

@mbollmann yeah, still getting used to that myself. I don't think I've written a thread since joining.
@mbollmann @Riedl Seems like mastodon has an opportunity to improve the thread user experience. it's open source, after all

@cpaxton @mbollmann Threading on Mastodon frustrates me. The Toot! ios app helps a lot with indicators in the UI. But it is a bandaid.

I think there are ways in which academics use threads and quote-tweets that are different and more constructive than other communities.

@Riedl @mbollmann i think there are plenty of people who use threads very well outside of academia, i don't like the idea that only academics/researchers can do it right.

Quote-tweet dunking is a real problem, but I'm reluctant to say mastodon does it better, right now mastodon seems... pretty ideologically homogeneous. as in all people I broadly agree with. Wonder how it will change as it grows

@cpaxton Oh oops, I didn't mean to say that only academics do threading right (I need to sleep). I meant to say it was important to how they come to communicate about work and discover work.

I'm torn on quote tweeting. I see the potential for abuse but I also see it as really useful. It could be an option for an instance to use or not. Community standards can be set on how it's used.

@Riedl I like the idea individual servers can configure this. In the end that's the strength of decentralization and low barriers, if something doesn't work you can export and leave right
@Riedl @anamarasovic great suggestion! Perhaps we should establish a set of instance-specific hashtags and conventions, including one for research threads. Will create a 'documentation' page somewhere soon...

@thegradient @Riedl +1 #tootorial 😍 Also hashtags for "slides/recording for a talk I gave", a new job announcement, etc? For many it is hard to improve their presence on social media as they don’t have much of their own work to share yet. Can we enable them to gain visibility by sharing their thoughts on other papers? Like a hashtag for “I read X, here are some thoughts”?

Perhaps we can have a github repo for the community guidelines/docs where people can open issues for their suggestions?

@thegradient @Riedl I know folks that either stopped using the ML/AI twitter or feel intimidated posting after harsh discussions that were happening there. I’d love to hear what people think we could do to keep things more friendly here.
@anamarasovic @thegradient this is something I’ve been wondering about. One answer is to set community standards, explicitly or by example early. The instance moderators have a lot of power but I hope they won’t need to step in too often. HCI.social and fediscience.org have some good community rules made explicit.
@anamarasovic @thegradient @Riedl I was thinking that something like #PaperReview or #MLPaperReview #PaperExplainer would be useful for discussing an interesting academic paper that you’re reading. I know, they’re boring hashtags, but better indicate academic papers as opposed to arbitrary tips and info.
@lowd @anamarasovic @thegradient I like #PaperExplainer. (#Explainodon ?). I’d stay away from anything suggesting “review” because that implies judgement, which you probably don’t mean.
@thegradient @Riedl @anamarasovic Also, we may want to use #PaperReview to complain about conference/journal reviews!
@lowd @thegradient @anamarasovic I’m extremely here for the complaining about peer review
@anamarasovic @thegradient @Riedl I think this is a wonderful idea. This would probably of interest to lots of us
@lukasmut @anamarasovic @thegradient @Riedl I think a tag like #PaperExplainer might imply purely expository writing. It would be nice to have a tag that includes discussion -- maybe something like #papertalk? That way it's not "review" / harsh

@Riedl @thegradient @anamarasovic cool, only whos to say whats early career? Ba ma industry phd post young prof? Just make it a type like new papers, or paper summaries

(Admittedly, I have some stakes here... I understood that when I, a nobody, write about a Stanford paper it suddenly gets traction, but not about a more exciting Tsinghua one. Since then I am writing about papers I read, regardless of their fame hoping to highlight what's interesting not hype. )

@LChoshen @thegradient @anamarasovic Anyone who says they are? The issue is that everyone will learn about the newest work of <insert prominent researcher at big university or lab>. There needs to be a means for others to gain visibility. So really, everyone should write about their papers all the time, and we should all keep an eye on the local feed.
@Riedl @LChoshen @thegradient @anamarasovic I even find that not all our students are aware that faculty are actually Doing Real Research - presenting our own new stuff can work great for engagement