This is a recreation of a Twitter thread of my response to someone who said re: scientists moving to Mastodon: "Leaving the global community to enter a silo makes no sense."

I think this represents a common misconception about Mastodon! The entire point of federated social media is that it isn't a silo. On Twitter you are in a Twitter silo. On a Mastodon instance you can interact with anyone on ANY instance.

[thread continues :) ]

Right now Mastodon *feels* like a silo because there aren't many people there - so yep, it isn't a global community. But neither was Twitter at the beginning. If we can only be on social media where everyone else *already* is, then we'll be held hostage forever.

To be clear, I think the "global community" part is really important for scientists, which is why I'm not leaving Twitter right now. But I would very much like to be *able* to.

[thread: 2/3]

I 100% agree that scientists not silo-ing themselves is important. But in theory that's an argument FOR federated social media. Like right now people on Facebook are not seeing my Tweets and maybe they should. :)

I'm not leaving Twitter... yet. But at this point there's a non-zero chance that it becomes unusable in the near future. :-\ So as a scientist who wants to communicate with people I want other options.

[thread: 3/3]

@cfiesler The amount of acaademic migration has surprised me a little bit. We are used to having our writing turned into someone else's profit, so I might have underestimated how long people were willing to wait and see with how bad Twitter would get in terms of abuse.
Rosacris :mastodon: (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image De las cosas bonitas que como #LaAraña suelo hacer es estar, ver, vivir cómo se arman las burbujas y al tiempo lanzar hilos que me permitan conectarme y conectar con otras burbujas. Con café en la mano pero sigo soñando... #Mastodon #Fediverse #Fediverse Las burbujas no tienen nada de malo, son nuestra red social próxima. El problema es cuando no se permean por lo que sucede en otras burbujas para transformarse a sí mismas.

Mastodon 🐘
@cfiesler I’ve kind of “paused” my Twitter but I don’t know that I’ll be back anytime soon.

@cfiesler I really love the counterpoint of reach to the idea of that leaving is silo-ing. In FB I do not control my feed. In Twitter... to some degree. In IG no idea and it is crowded with promotions. So that would support the idea of federation not oppose it.

But the challenge is how not to increase the cost of doing this outreach if we spread across too many spaces. I feel this cannot be really though in an "individual scientist" level, but a community one.

@cfiesler just like universities provide email service, they could easily provide a mastodon instance for all their academics/staff. Would be useful as an indicator of providence of the data, opinion, etc. Also marketing for the uni. And if the academic leaves they can just migrate to another instance.
@chotee @cfiesler I like this general idea, but the #AcademicFreedom devil is in the details (and depends on how supportive vs. toxic your upper admin is). On that final point, I’d be fine with it at my institution right now, but three or four years ago? No way.

@dezene @chotee @cfiesler
But you could easily set up an instance for, say, geologists world wide, and when flat earthers knock on your door, you can refuse them. They might then set up a flat earth instance for themselves, but you can defederate from them.

That way you can talk geologists worldwide without having to wade through a timeline of nonsense, threats and trolling.

@StroomAfwaarts @dezene @chotee I mean this is much of what's happening right now - I'm on an instance that's all HCI researchers.
@cfiesler @dezene @chotee ah! I missed that detail! 😊
But! As you can see, I can read your toots too, so you are in no way in a silo!
And you can share lectures via peertube, or cool science pics on pixelfed, the possibilities are legio.
Bottom line: Doesn't sound like a silo to me! 😀
@StroomAfwaarts @dezene @chotee haha yes how it works in practice is pretty neat!

@cfiesler Here's what I tell to people that claim Mastodon is 'siloed':

https://twitter.com/Oblomov/status/1588883376865673216

Oblomov on Twitter

“@johannabee @DiligentBeaver @peggy_blair I think one of the example of how Mastodon is the opposite of a silo is the fact that you can interact (follow, converse with, etc) with users on different _platforms_. Like if you could comment on Facebook posts from Twitter or like a YouTube video from Instagram. >”

Twitter

@cfiesler Very much in agreement that the smaller community size can have a siloing feel and that the Fediverse is capable of being far more networked than the silos of Twitter or Facebook.

However, in practise, because server admins have complete autonomy as to which instances get blocked and which are allowed to federate, it is easy for a fedizen to unwittingly end up in a silo simply because their admin has decided instance X is <insert name of odious ideology> and blocked it.

@cfiesler So long as fedizens are awake and aware to the general climate of de-federation, or safe spaces as it is more fashionable to term it, they are in a position to make a call on when they are inadvertently entering a silo.

@cfiesler

>But at this point there's a non-zero chance that it becomes unusable in the near future.

Elon is making that decision to leave twitter for us. Can't be on twitter if the servers break down and there is no institutional knowledge left on how to get them up again. taps_forehead.jpg

@cfiesler I do think instances contribute to the *feeling* of silos, because you can only see a specific slice of the fediverse from each instance (in hashtags, feeds, and federated views) determined by the social network of people on that instance. there’s an intentional creating of new network that needs to happen by people on smaller or topical instances interested in global community, in addition to more and different folks coming into the fediverse
@christa I don’t see how this is that different than Twitter though, where your feed is largely based on who you follow?
@cfiesler i think the hashtag is maybe the best example - on twitter a hashtag search will search all of twitter. a hashtag search on mastodon can only search instances and accounts your instance knows about, which varies based on the network of the instance. this sort of extends to other discovery mechanisms, though perhaps not as clearly

@christa @cfiesler as I understand it, we start in a village. But there is noth8ng to stop us seeing what’s going on elsewhere and making connections with other villages. If people are saying interesting things, it’ll get shared.

So make connections within and outwith your village, say interesting things and share interesting things.

@cfiesler think the same can be said for the #Twitterstorian #histodon community
@cfiesler and as someone who joined all of 24 hours ago I see a significant increase over just that period. Which amazes me.
I do feel like Musk may have created a critical mass of people willing to move. I created a Mastodon account a while back but there were not enough people here for it to be an alternative in any meaningful way.
It does feel different today and I really hope that it is different this time.
@cfiesler
@ajWasThere I saw a tweet that said that Elon Musk really did provide he can push a social network to unexpected success quickly, and that network is Mastodon :)
@cfiesler Good response; I also think many ppl completely overestimate how ”global” #Birdsite is
@henrikornebring @cfiesler absolutely! I have heard academics from other parts of the world lament how US-centric much of the culture and content of Twitter is/was
@cfiesler I thought so at first as well until someone explained to me the Federated timeline that makes so much sense. However if people you follow don't follow someone saying something interesting, AFAIK you'll never see it?
@guillaumelegoy well you probably wouldn’t on Twitter either
@cfiesler true you actually need to follow someone following said message. Like in here, good point.

@cfiesler

Exactly, @guillaumelegoy. You wouldn’t.

I’m sceptical about the federated timeline in any case. It will be too much of a firehose, containing too much noise versus signal for any individual user.

You can only get a sample of what your local community (the people on your instance) appreciates from your local timeline. And still you will likely miss out on many interesting things people say.

1/2

For lack of an algorithm, you will really have to put your hands out of your sleeves and do some serious list curation. Create lists for the themes you’re interested in and add people who are your heroes for those themes.

There is no way you can filter a feed of all the things you find interesting. You’ll have to work through your own curated “gate openers”.

And of course searching with hashtags. And just browsing around for added serendipity.

Should be fun enough, right?

2/2

@cfiesler the number of professors and researchers in my feed here is *wonderful* though!
@cfiesler thanks for a great blog post. Do you think once we get a critical mass on Mastodon then the network effect will kick in to overcome the friction of users migrating from Twitter?

@cfiesler I saw someone on twitter compare the siloing to discord, which shows a deep misunderstanding of the structure.

I consistently explain to ppl that instances are also how Twitter runs, it's just they own them all and hide the seams from you. This isn't fundamentally different than twitter in terms of its potential reach in your feed.

@cfiesler I think some people still don't understand the federation part …
@cfiesler And beyond, since the Fediverse is more just than Mastodon, and nearly all uses the same sharing protocol
@cfiesler I've seen the " silo" comment several times on the bird app about Mastodon. When people see names of instances, they seem to think they'll be limited to certain topics. Some education "over there" is badly needed.