Ralf RottmannI read this elsewhere: If trusted news outlets would start offering #Mastodon instances to their staff, that would bring some sort of verification and visibility. Think social.nytimes.com, social.heise.de etc. I'd love to read more from trusted journalists on the #fediverse and this could greatly help. (Again, not my idea but couldn't find the original author.) Boosts for visibility would be great. Reminder: Favorites don't help as on this other platform.
Frau Nora 🦋@ralf That is an interesting thought. But you have a lot of freelance workers in media. Working for more then one editorial. How to deal with that? Who should be visible and verified in that case? Presenters? News Anchors? Lead journalists?
@fraunora I think mastodons excellent multi-user and migration features actually support this scenario pretty well.
@ralf I wouldn't want five mastodon accounts to communicate and always think about which editorial might be involved.
@fraunora Yeah. Understandable. But would you mind having an account at one instance you trust and (partially) work for?
@ralf No, I wouldn't mind. But the editorial might. Because you always seem to speak in their name. And that can be problematic for the organisation. We have seen that with Omagate. And it might lead to the company/editorial making rules for how to use social media in their name. And as a freelance journalist I don't like that thought at all.
Stephen Judge 🇮🇪🇪🇺@fraunora @ralf Good points, I wonder if a dedicated #Journalists instance might be the answer. Independent of a specific media outlet, but a dedicated space for people that can prove their journalistic credentials. I'm thinking along the lines of like how https://eupolicy.social/about exists for EU policy professionals.
@fraunora @ralf And poof! your wish is granted
https://journa.host/about
"An experimental server to help onboard journalists to Mastodon"
