POSITIVE: The proposal addresses important topics in contemporary astrophysics, making it a timely and appropriate use of telescope time. The observations are well-suited to the stated objectives.

NEGATIVE: The sample size is not well motivated, and it is unclear how the results will generalize more broadly. The proposal would have been stronger had it made explicit comparison to theoretical predictions.

Grade: 3/5.

Any other generic, boilerplate, zero-information TAC comments, #astrodon?