RT @[email protected]

so everyone knows that sci-hub is being sued in India such that if they win they might be able to operate legally, but if they lose a huge number of scientists and academics in India wouldn't be able to access papers? Any senior ppl planning to write amicus briefs by the 16th?

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/json_dirs/status/1459743590280622085

𝚓𝚘𝚗𝚗𝚢﹏𝚜𝚊𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜 on Twitter

“so everyone knows that sci-hub is being sued in India such that if they win they might be able to operate legally, but if they lose a huge number of scientists and academics in India wouldn't be able to access papers? Any senior ppl planning to write amicus briefs by the 16th?”

Twitter
Group of Delhi Scholars: "The profit margins of the plaintiffs are higher than the oil. medical, and tech industries. They have effectively priced out the knowledge commons for the elite few. See attached 'Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era'"
Elsevier: "1 sec"
Sci-Hub: Researchers File Intervention Application To Fight ISP Blocking * TorrentFreak

Social science researchers have filed an intervention application to prevent ISP blocking of Sci-Hub at the behest of major publishers.

oh and if you want to follow along at home, case documents for CS(COMM)572/2020: https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhc_case_status_aprox_oj_list.asp?ctype=CS(COMM)&cno=724&cyear=2017
and idk this IP addressed page gets linked a lot for seraching but lmao (sometimes works, otherwise replace fields in above url): http://164.100.69.66/pcase/guiCaseWise.php
Welcome to High Court of Delhi

this is actually one of The Things That Actually Matters to the course of science rn btw. This is effectively the question of whether or not the global south will have access to scientific knowledge from now on. a dynamic injunction on sci-hub in India would be devastating
this is to be read in context with numerous lobbying efforts to convince librarians and university CISOs to implement mandatory 2fa and embrace federated identity (under publisher control), watch for SeamlessAccess showing up on a paywall near u soon
(long story short 2fa kills sci-hub)
short story short ACADEMIC INTERVENTION IS EFFECTIVE in this court case, or at least the publishers seem to respond to it. this document is filed by 6 social scientists. can we get 6 more senior academics to file something similar? or make any noise at all?
istg the sooner we stop being shy about this, the sooner we can start talking seriously about a better future for science

@jonny Related to that 2FA bit:

"Surveillance capitalism in our libraries " (SWIB21)
Sarah Lamdan, CUNY School of Law

(35m, with slides)

https://yewtu.be/cPImp8cu5BM

#Libraries #Librarians #SWIB21 #SarahLamdan #CUNY #Surveillance #SurveillanceCapitalism

KEYNOTE: Surveillance capitalism in our libraries

KEYNOTE: Surveillance capitalism in our libraries Sarah Lamdan, CUNY School of Law Abstract In the transition from industrial to informational capitalism, much of our lived experience has gone from physical to digital, including library services. As publishers, library vendors, and other informational service providers have become internet-based companies, their business models have transitioned from analog services to data-based services. In short, our traditional library service providers are becoming data analytics companies, dabbling in, or diving into personal data brokering. From RELX to ProQuest, major library vendors are finding new ways to extract and monetize people's personal data. Researchers are finding surveillance software like ThreatMetrix in their research databases, and data analytics companies like Clarivate are trying to acquire ProQuest, a major library service platform provider to exploit library patrons' data to create more academic metrics to sell grant funders and research institutions. All of these corporate decisions are part of a trend of our vendors collecting library patrons' personal data. The increasing surveillance capitalism in our library spaces makes open access more important than ever.