Reminder that Alcoholics Anonymous is a Christian faith, not science, based organization that was founded in the 30s at a time when we understood almost nothing about the actual mechanical function of the brain and addiction, and that their 12 steps have become so ingrained in the US medical system and culture that most people and medical professionals dont realize there are other better researched options available now.

Has AA helped some people, sure absolutely. But, call me a stickler, im very much not a fan of a program for overcoming addiction categorically claiming that anyone who the program doesnt work for just had something inherently sick and wrong about how they were born.

Maybe your Christian Group Huddle just isnt a one size fits all solution, dumbasses.

“Rarely have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this simple program, usually men and women who are constitutionally incapable of being honest with themselves. There are such unfortunates. They are not at fault; they seem to have been born that way.”

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucccckkkkkkkkkkkk

Oooooffffffffffffffffffffffffff

@swiff plenty of more "scientific" paradigms for treatment have similar axiomatic nonsense at the bedrock. Look up ABA - a "treatment" for Autism that is still the primary in the West - and quotes from the founder if you want to make your skin crawl.

Psychology studies are mostly observational - expose people to a modality, track their success. It is hard to disprove psychological theories.

@swiff Hell, CBT, Family Systems Therapy, and Existential Therapy - 3 modalities of therapy taught and used widely - have entirely different core theories about the mind. All constructed basically the same way as AA.

Someone thought a lot, read books, and constructed a theory of the mind, and derived a solution from that theory.

@swiff We do not have the fidelity of imaging to disprove any of them, only observe their relative effectiveness.

All this to say I agree AA sucks, but if you think there is a more rationally proven model out there that has a stronger basis in brain scans and tested data about neurology you will be disappointed.

@dualhammers no, but there ARE models out there that have statistically supported better efficacy than AA. We can get lost in the weeds of minutia and phrasing here, or we can move on understanding that im not claiming to be an addiction expert and am calling out a particularly monolithic organization in that realm.

@swiff Of course. I latched onto the phrasing because it is all I know about you and I took it in good faith you used the best phrasing you could to articulate your position.

in any event, I agree with the call out. It is important people understand the theory of mind behind any treatment before they submit to it

@dualhammers thats legit, apologies if i bristled a bit. Good article recc too, ty
@swiff no worries. I understand a stranger entering your menchies with verbosity basically produces a pavlovian stress response in all of us veterans of online