Indias MuslimsNov 17, 2019

KK Muhammad was never part of BB Lal's Ayodhya excavation team: AMU prof

The fact is that he was NEVER a part of BB Lal's excavation team. The reports filed by BB Lal himself & published in the Archaeological Survey of India Reports his name is nowhere!
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/kk-muhammad-was-never-part-of-bb-lals-ayodhya-excavation-team-amu-prof/articleshow/71548782.cms

KK Muhammad was never part of BB Lal's Ayodhya excavation team: AMU prof | India News - Times of India

India News: The following letter was sent to TOI by professor Syed Ali Rizvi, chairman, department of history, Aligarh Muslim University, in response to an interv.

Show threadKrishnarajNov 17, 2019
@IndiasMuslims Interesting revelation. KK Muhammed must now be asked to answer the pertinent questions including the contents of the inscription found.
Show threadIndias MuslimsNov 17, 2019
@Krishnarajb75 And the article is from October 2019!
Show threadKrishnarajNov 17, 2019
@IndiasMuslims The issue with underlying structure being a temple was not proved even in the final verdict.
Show threadNSure ✔

@Krishnarajb75 @IndiasMuslims

The court accepts it as a fact that the underlying structure was not the remains of a Temple, alright. But the by the page where the judgment is passed comes, this info was forgotten!!

Court even concedes that in 1949, idols of Ram were placed inside the Mosque and that the Mosque became a Temple overnight!!

It is the silliest judgment I've ever come across - and I have seen a few too!!

Nov 17, 2019 at 6:41pmWeb
Show threadKrishnarajNov 17, 2019
@NSure @IndiasMuslims The existence of a mosque would have altered the judgement definitely. But I am not sure what facts can alter the current judgement unless the review petition brings a stay on the temple construction.