AdvManojJuristic person - excessive pages have been devoted to the legal concept that has been settled by the Courts in the nineteenth century.
And I'm only on page 164
Sejal JobanputraPara 126 defies logical reasoning.
Tieffenthaler in the 18th century and Robert Montgomery Martin in early 19th did not refer to - Dome.
Claims of Nirmohis and individual devotees such as Nihang Singh that the Janamsthan is located under the 3 Domes - was rejected by 3 Courts
On 24/12/1885 by Sub-Judge
By District Judge in Appeal.
On 1/11/1886 by Judicial Commissioner Oudh.
Then to hold it as a foundation appears to be erroneous.
Para 128 records - Dr Rajeev
Dhavan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the plaintiffs in Suit 4 admitted the
juristic personality of the first plaintiff.
So, the long discussion on 'juristic person', was, essentially, unnecessary.
shirish@AdvManoj probably diversionary tactics perhaps ?