Gautam BhatiaNov 8, 2019

I don't want to say much about tomorrow's judgment, but I do want to make one point. The case being decided tomorrow is a land dispute that was instituted decades ago, and pre-dates 1992. Tomorrow's verdict is not and cannot be an endorsement of what happened in 1992, no matter how much some people want to portray it that way. It's a ruling on a land dispute.

I think we do ourselves an equal disservice if we follow this pattern of escalation and make it out to be about something that it's not.

Show threadAamil SyedNov 9, 2019
@gautambhatia this is definitely not true. The case is about illegal razing of the mosque. The land dispute is merely a tool to legitimise it. Not that they truly need the legitimacy; they were perfectly fine with having done do against the law of the land too. Anyway, I understand your appeal to not escalate the situation, but please do not trivialise the matter either, by calling it just a land dispute. No sir, it is not merely that.
Show threadGautam Bhatia
@aamil4u Fair enough.
Nov 9, 2019 at 12:30pmWeb